1420 ViRtual prOficiency Based prOgression for Robotic Training (VROBOT): A Prospective Cohort Study Protocol

Introduction Robotic surgery is an evolving field that requires specialist training. Historically, robotic surgery training has lacked standardisation. Recently, training centres have introduced proficiency-based modules and curriculums to certify and progress the skills of novice robotic surgeons. However, training tends to be self-directed and non-interactive. Limited interactive teaching does exist but can be inaccessible and expensive. We aim to validate the effectiveness of the current Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery (FRS) training curriculum with the addition of interactive virtual classroom teaching. Method 16 novice surgical trainees will be assigned to two training groups. The interventions will be implemented following a one-week robotic skills induction. Both groups will receive access to the FRS curriculum for one week. The intervention group will additionally receive virtual classroom robotic skills training. The primary outcome will be the objective performance scores after training using a synthetic model based on task errors, time taken and contact pressure. In week 3, each group will receive the alternate intervention and objective performance scores will be measured to determine the trajectory of scores. Results Significant objective performance improvement following the intervention will be indicative of intervention quality. Conclusions This will be the first feasibility study evaluating the efficacy of interactive virtual robotic surgery training. It will determine the effect size of virtual classroom training on the development of basic robotic surgical skills in addition to the proficiency-based FRS curriculum. The findings will assist the development and implementation of further resource-efficient virtual robotic surgical skills training programs.

A National Survey of Robotic Surgery Training Among Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Residents

Objective: The aim of this study is to describe the current state of robotic surgery training among Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) residency programs in the United States. Methods: This is a national survey study among OHNS residents. All OHNS residency programs were identified via the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education website. A total of 64/127 (50.3%) of OHNS programs were selected based on a random number generator. The main outcome measure was the number of OHNS residents with access to robotic surgery training and assessment of operative experience in robotic surgery among those residents. Results: A total of 140 OHNS residents participated in the survey, of which 59.3% (n = 83) were male. Response rate was 40.2%. Respondents came from middle 50.0% (n = 70), southern 17.8% (n = 25), western 17.8% (n = 25), and eastern sections 14.3% (n = 20). Most respondents (94.3%, n = 132) reported that their institution utilized a robot for head and neck surgery. Resident experience at the bedside increased in the junior years of training and console experience increased across the years particularly for more senior residents. However, 63.4% of residents reported no operative experience at the console. Only 11.4% of programs have a structured robotics training program. Conclusion: This survey indicated that nearly all OHNS residencies utilize robotic surgery in their clinical practice with residents receiving little formal education in robotics or experience at the console. OHNS residencies should aim to increase access to training opportunities in order to increase resident competency. Level of Evidence: IV