Sex-Positivity, Medical Mistrust, and PrEP Conspiracy Beliefs Among HIV-Negative Cisgender Black Sexual Minority Men in Atlanta, Georgia

Author(s):  
John Mark Wiginton ◽  
Lisa A. Eaton ◽  
Ryan J. Watson ◽  
Jessica L. Maksut ◽  
Valerie A. Earnshaw ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven A. John ◽  
K. Marie Sizemore ◽  
Ruben H. Jimenez ◽  
S. Scott Jones ◽  
Andrew E. Petroll ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND HIV disproportionately affects sexual minority men (SMM) in the U.S. OBJECTIVE We sought to determine past HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) use and current pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among an online sample of cisgender and transgender men who have sex with men. METHODS In 2019, HIV-negative and unknown status SMM (n=63,015) were recruited via geosocial networking apps, social media, and other online venues to participate in a brief eligibility screening survey. Individuals were asked about past PEP and current PrEP use. We examined associations of demographics, socioeconomic indicators, recent club drug use, and current PrEP use on past PEP use using fully-adjusted logistic regression. RESULTS Prior PEP use was relatively uncommon (11.3%), with 2.66 times more men reporting current PrEP use (30.1%). Most (85.9%) past PEP users were current PrEP users, representing 32.2% of all current PrEP users. In multivariable analysis, current PrEP users had 20.1 times higher odds (95%CI: 18.6-21.6) of past PEP use compared to non-PrEP users. Other factors significantly (p<0.001) associated with past PEP use but with smaller effect sizes included: older age (>24 years old) compared to younger age (AOR=1.15); bisexual identity compared to gay (AOR=0.86); Latino, Black, and other/multiracial race/ethnicity compared to white, individually (AORs=1.37-1.52); having health insurance (AOR=0.80); and recent club drug use (AOR=1.19). CONCLUSIONS Prior PEP use was relatively uncommon in our online sample of SMM, but our findings indicate PEP could potentially be a gateway to PrEP. Advertising and prescribing PEP could support efforts to increase PrEP.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Raquel Ramos ◽  
Rueben Warren ◽  
Michele Shedlin ◽  
Gail Melkus ◽  
Trace Kershaw ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 3456-3461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devon Kimball ◽  
David Rivera ◽  
Manuel Gonzales ◽  
Aaron J. Blashill

Author(s):  
Trevor A. Hart ◽  
Julia R. G. Vernon ◽  
Nathan Grant Smith

This chapter reviews sexual health HIV-prevention interventions for HIV-negative sexual minority men, focusing on interventions with empirical support with an emphasis on interventions with support from randomized controlled trials. Most interventions focus on condomless anal sex, with the goal of reducing HIV acquisition, although interventions vary in terms of format (individual, group, or online), target age and ethnicity, and outcomes. A much smaller literature exists for sexual health beyond preventing HIV. Research is needed to further test the efficacy and external validity of sexual health interventions, including with older men who have sex with men. Many of the interventions discussed in this chapter use techniques that are familiar to therapists who employ cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT). There is also a need for further work that uses the therapeutic modalities employed by most mental health professionals who practice within an empirically supported therapy orientation, such as CBT, interpersonal therapy, or behavioral therapies.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron S. Breslow ◽  
Anthea Chan ◽  
Eric Arnold ◽  
Elizabeth Glaeser ◽  
Aysegul Yucel ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document