Erratum to: Litigation as dispute resolution mechanism in Islamic finance: Malaysian experience

Rule of law is the foundation of modern democracies. It envisages, inter alia, participatory lawmaking, just and certain laws, a bouquet of human rights, certainty and equality in the application of law, accountability to law, an impartial and non-arbitrary government, and an accessible and fair dispute resolution mechanism. This work’s primary goal is to understand and explain the obvious dichotomy that exists between theory and practice in India’s rule of law structure. The book discusses the contours of the rule of law in India, the values and aspirations in its evolution, and its meaning as understood by the various institutions, identifying reason as the primary element in the rule of law mechanism. It later examines the institutional, political, and social challenges to the concepts of equality and certainty, through which it evaluates the status of the rule of law in India.

Download Full-text

Pivotal New Roles and Changes Introduced by the 2017 FIDIC’s Claim and Dispute Resolution Mechanism

Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction ◽

10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000355 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 12 (1) ◽

pp. 04519049 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Mohammad Barakat ◽

Mohamed-Asem Abdul-Malak ◽

Hiam Khoury

Keyword(s):

Dispute Resolution ◽

Dispute Resolution Mechanism

Download Full-text

Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Informasi Publik di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Denpasar

Jurnal Preferensi Hukum ◽

10.22225/jph.1.2.2346.93-98 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1 (2) ◽

pp. 93-98

Author(s):

I Made Bayu Ari Budi Utama ◽

Ida Ayu Putu Widiati ◽

Luh Putu Suryani

Keyword(s):

Dispute Resolution ◽

Public Information ◽

Implementation Process ◽

Empirical Method ◽

Public Agency ◽

Administrative Process ◽

Material Sources ◽

Litigation Process ◽

Public Body ◽

Dispute Resolution Mechanism

The sustainability of public information is an inseparable aspect of democracy, which upholds freedom and human rights. The sustainability of public information is an important aspect in fulfilling individual rights to public information. However, in practice, the public's understanding of the dispute resolution mechanism on the Sustainability of Public Information is still low. In addition, in the implementation of this Public Information Sustainability dispute, there are still obstacles that can interfere with the implementation process. That can be in the form of the applicant's lack of interest in requesting information and the applicant's lack of understanding of the administrative process in dispute implementation. Based on these problems, the purpose of this study is to know the efforts to resolve public information disputes and practice the process of dispute resolution on the sustainability of public information. The research method used is the empirical method assisted by primary and secondary legal material sources and uses qualitative techniques, namely by describing legal data first, then analyze through analysis techniques with interpretive techniques and shed descriptively in the form of a thesis. Efforts to resolve public information disputes can be carried out through two processes, namely the non-litigation process carried out at the competent Regional Information Commission and the litigation process undertaken at the State Administrative Court if the disputing public body is a State-owned public agency or a PN if the disputing public body is said. is a private public body. In practice, the process of resolving information sustainability disputes in Indonesia still has obstacles which can be in the form of misunderstandings caused by the applicant's lack of understanding of the application mechanism or the stages of the administrative process that must be passed in filing a dispute on the sustainability of public information.

Download Full-text