scholarly journals Human Capital, Innovation, and Climate Policy: an Integrated Assessment

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Carraro ◽  
Enrica De Cian ◽  
Massimo Tavoni
2015 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. 45-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elmar Kriegler ◽  
Nils Petermann ◽  
Volker Krey ◽  
Valeria Jana Schwanitz ◽  
Gunnar Luderer ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi-Ling Hsu

AbstractOne question left unanswered by the 2015 Paris Agreement is exactly how the world will meet the daunting technological challenges that lie ahead. This article proposes a global strategy to build up human capital oriented towards two bodies of knowledge: alternative, non-fossil systems of energy generation, delivery and consumption; and a deeper understanding of climate systems that might be geoengineered to reduce atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases. Simply committing funding to climate technology is insufficient; a global climate technology policy must take into account the unique growth properties of human capital, and the conditions under which it can grow.Human capital should be the focus of an international climate agreement for three reasons. Firstly, the wrong kind of human capital (attached to fossil fuel-related methods of energy generation and consumption) has helped to create an unfavourable political economy for climate policy. Secondly, the right kind of human capital (broader, and building on fundamental understandings of energy systems and climate systems) can create a more favourable political economy for climate policy. Thirdly, the technological changes needed for both mitigation and geoengineering technologies are so profound that a human capital stock must be developed with a conscious focus on radical technological change that can be delivered quickly. While individual countries may pursue an enlightened human capital policy on their own, cooperation at the international level would maximize the scale economies of inventive effort.


2012 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 1250004 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALEXANDER LORENZ ◽  
ELMAR KRIEGLER ◽  
HERMANN HELD ◽  
MATTHIAS G. W. SCHMIDT

We investigate the importance of explicitly accounting for uncertainty in the determination of optimal global climate policy. We demonstrate that the marginal risk premium determines the importance of adapting the optimal policy to uncertainty. Common integrated assessment models (IAM) of climate change suggest uncertainty has little effect because the marginal risk premium in these models is small. A rigorous investigation of the marginal risk premium and the marginal functional relationships within IAMs allows understanding the non-significance of (thin-tailed) uncertainty as a result of compensating factors in the climate cause-effect chain.


2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick van der Ploeg ◽  
Armon Rezai

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document