Ace inhibitor therapy for heart failure in patients with impaired renal function: a review of the literature

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali A. Valika ◽  
Mihai Gheorghiade
1998 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry E Bleske ◽  
Laura A Cornish ◽  
Steven R Erickson ◽  
John M Nicklas

Objective: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy is considered the standard of care for the treatment of congestive heart failure. Despite this, clinical experience suggests that not all patients may be receiving ACE inhibitor therapy or may be receiving low dosages. This study was performed to better understand the use of ACE inhibitor therapy in clinical practice. Design and Participants: We reviewed the medical therapy of 110 patients with a history of congestive heart failure referred to an outpatient heart failure clinic at a university teaching hospital. Outcome Measures: This observational study evaluated the use of ACE inhibitors, including dosage, as well as other drugs to treat congestive heart failure. Results: Approximately 85% (93/110) of patients were receiving an ACE inhibitor. Twenty percent (22/110) were receiving enalapril 20 mg/d or more, captopril 150 mg/d or more, lisinopril 20 mg/d or more, or quinapril 40 mg/d or more. The remaining patients (n = 71) were receiving these drugs at lower dosages. However, 21 of the remaining patients (19% of all patients) were receiving lower dosages based on patient-specific parameters; 47 of the remaining patients (43% of all patients) were eligible to have their dosage increased. Ten eligible patients were not receiving an ACE inhibitor. The majority of patients were also receiving digoxin (70%) and loop diuretic (80%) therapy. Conclusions: Approximately 85% of patients were receiving ACE inhibitor therapy, with 9% of eligible patients not receiving an ACE inhibitor. In the patients receiving ACE inhibitor therapy, approximately 50% (47/93) were receiving dosages below those suggested in the guidelines. Overall, the use of ACE inhibitor therapy is varied and intervention appears required to ensure that all patients receive appropriate therapy for the treatment of congestive heart failure.


2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. S96
Author(s):  
Fatima Franco ◽  
Francisco Goncalves ◽  
Graca Casto ◽  
Maria E Morais ◽  
Carlos Andrade ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 148 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom D.J. Smilde ◽  
Hans L. Hillege ◽  
Gerjan Navis ◽  
Frans Boomsma ◽  
Dick de Zeeuw ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 539-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Zeller ◽  
Christian Müller ◽  
Ulrich Frank ◽  
Karlheinz Bürgelin ◽  
Uwe Schwarzwälder ◽  
...  

Purpose: To examine long-term survival after angioplasty and stenting of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS). Methods: Over a 5-year period, 241 consecutive patients (153 men; mean age 67±9 years, range 44–84) were treated with angioplasty and stent implantation for 355 ostial renal stenoses >70%. The procedures were performed in standard fashion using a variety of stents. For survival analysis, the patients were divided into 3 groups based on baseline creatinine levels: group 1: 115 (48%) patients with normal renal function (creatinine <1.2 mg/dL); group 2: 93 (39%) patients with moderately impaired renal function (creatinine 1.2 to 2.5 mg/dL); and group 3: 33 (13%) patients with severely impaired renal function (creatinine >2.5 mg/dL). Results: All patients were treated successfully without any procedure-related mortality. The 30-day mortality was 0.4% (1/241). Twenty-two patients died during a follow-up of 27±15 months (range 1–60) (overall survival 91%). The causes of death were cardiac (congestive heart failure or myocardial infarction, 73%), stroke (13.5%), and malignant disease (13.5%). The survival rate was significantly lower (29.6%) in patients with a baseline serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dL (p<0.0001) than in groups 2 (89.1%) or 1 (95.4%). Long-term survival without hemodialysis or restenosis was 66.6% at 48 months. Independent predictors for a reduced survival were left ventricle function (HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.45 to 4.63, p=0.001 for each 15% incremental decrease), age (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.25, p=0.011), and baseline renal function (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.29, p=0.014). Conclusions: Survival after successful stenting for severe ostial RAS depends on baseline serum creatinine and left ventricle function. Efforts must be made to avoid the development of advanced ischemic nephropathy and congestive heart failure.


2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 872-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain Cohen-Solal ◽  
Dipak Kotecha ◽  
Dirk J van Veldhuisen ◽  
Daphne Babalis ◽  
Michael Böhm ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (02) ◽  
pp. 182-186
Author(s):  
Dr. Shazia Kazi ◽  
Dr. Muhammad Adnan Bawany ◽  
Dr. Feroz Memon ◽  
Dr. Fasih Ahmed Hashmi ◽  
Dr. Sajjad Kazi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document