scholarly journals Household Debt, Maternal Well-Being, and Child Adjustment in Germany: Examining the Family Stress Model by Family Structure

Author(s):  
Valerie Heintz-Martin ◽  
Claudia Recksiedler ◽  
Alexandra N. Langmeyer

AbstractThe amount of household debt tripled globally over the last decades and a sizable share of individuals and families are overindebted due to mortgages, credit cards, or consumer debt. Yet research on the distribution of debt across families, and potential ripple effects of the psychological burden related to debt on well-being and family relations, remains sparse. Our study aims to fill these gaps by examining the socio-demographic profiles of families that have accumulated household debt and the unique role that the psychological burden related to debt plays on associations between mothers’ well-being, parental dynamics, and child adjustment based on the Family Stress Model (FSM). We used representative survey data collected in 2019 from Germany (N = 3271), which is one of the richest economies worldwide, yet about 10% of adults reported to be overindebted. Logistic regression results showed that single mothers were less likely to have debt compared to mothers in two-parent families. However, both single mothers and mothers in stepfamilies with high levels of perceived economic strain were particularly likely to report having debt. Structural equation modeling yielded that the links between the psychological burden of debt, maternal well-being, parental dynamics, and child adjustment were largely in line with the FSM, except for single mothers. We conclude that persisting financial disparities by family structure may be partially fostered by unique characteristics of the German welfare state, such as promoting more a traditional two-parent norm, and discuss our findings in light of practical implications.

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 349-350
Author(s):  
Rachel Scott ◽  
Danielle Nadorff ◽  
Loriena Yancura ◽  
Melissa Barnett

Abstract The Family Stress Model (FSM) of Economic Hardship (Conger, Rueter, & Conger, 2000) was developed to explain the impact of financial stress on families through links between economic difficulties, parental emotional distress, marital conflict, disrupted parenting behaviors, and child maladjustment. The FSM has been cross validated in samples of custodial grandparents (i.e., grandparents who provide substantial care for their grandchildren; Smith et al., 2017). The current study modified the FSM by replacing inter-parent relationship difficulties with inter-generational relationship problems between the custodial grandparents and their children to ultimately examine the adjustment of the grandchildren. This change to the model is supported by prior research conducted on intergenerational stress impacting the parenting and subsequent development of children in grandfamilies (Barnett, Mills-Koonce, Gustafsson, & Cox, 2012). Using a nationwide sample of 317 custodial grandparents aged 40 and older (M = 61 yr) the fit of the modified model was tested using AMOS 26. Latent variables in the model included Economic Pressure, Caregiver Distress, Disrupted Parenting, Intergenerational Relationship, and Child Adjustment. Moderate fit was achieved (χ2(308) = 574.88; CFI = .896; RMSEA = .052). All pathways were significant with the exception of Disrupted Parenting to Child Adjustment. These results indicate that intergenerational relationships are an important predictor of child adjustment, and an applicable substitute for inter-partner relationships when modeling family stress in custodial grandfamilies. Details and clinical implications will be discussed.


2010 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 740-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerf W. K. Yeung ◽  
Yuk-Chung Chan

Consonant with the family stress model, in this study family economic disadvantage, concomitant with cumulative family stressors, concurrently contributed to poor family functioning of 504 Chinese families in an impoverished neighborhood in Hong Kong, in which the later factor appeared to be more pronounced. Implications were briefly discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 2667-2677
Author(s):  
Samantha C. Holmes ◽  
Maria M. Ciarleglio ◽  
Xuemei Song ◽  
Ashley Clayton ◽  
Megan V. Smith

Author(s):  
Tricia K. Neppl ◽  
Olivia N. Diggs ◽  
Kandauda A. S. Wickrama ◽  
Catherine Walker O'Neal

2003 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 316-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee-Kyung Kwon ◽  
Martha A. Rueter ◽  
Mi-Sook Lee ◽  
Seonju Koh ◽  
Sun Wha Ok

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document