Self-management practices among primary care patients with musculoskeletal pain and depression

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa M. Damush ◽  
Jingwei Wu ◽  
Matthew J. Bair ◽  
Jason M. Sutherland ◽  
Kurt Kroenke
Pain Medicine ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1280-1290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Bair ◽  
Marianne S. Matthias ◽  
Kathryn A. Nyland ◽  
Monica A. Huffman ◽  
DaWana L. Stubbs ◽  
...  

JAMA ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 301 (20) ◽  
pp. 2099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt Kroenke ◽  
Matthew J. Bair ◽  
Teresa M. Damush ◽  
Jingwei Wu ◽  
Shawn Hoke ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 668-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara J. Turner ◽  
Yuanyuan Liang ◽  
Maureen J. Simmonds ◽  
Natalia Rodriguez ◽  
Raudel Bobadilla ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 37-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Tsuey Lim ◽  
Yvonne Mei Fong Lim ◽  
Xin Rou Teh ◽  
Yi Lin Lee ◽  
Siti Aminah Ismail ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To determine the extent of self-management support (SMS) provided to primary care patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertension and its associated factors. Design Cross-sectional survey conducted between April and May 2017. Setting Forty public clinics in Malaysia. Participants A total of 956 adult patients with T2D and/or hypertension were interviewed. Main Outcome Measures Patient experience on SMS was evaluated using a structured questionnaire of the short version Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care instrument, PACIC-M11. Linear regression analysis adjusting for complex survey design was used to determine the association of patient and clinic factors with PACIC-M11 scores. Results The overall PACIC-M11 mean was 2.3(SD,0.8) out of maximum of 5. The subscales’ mean scores were lowest for patient activation (2.1(SD,1.1)) and highest for delivery system design/decision support (2.9(SD,0.9)). Overall PACIC-M11 score was associated with age, educational level and ethnicity. Higher overall PACIC-M11 ratings was observed with increasing difference between actual and expected consultation duration [β = 0.01; 95% CI (0.001, 0.03)]. Better scores were also observed among patients who would recommend the clinic to friends and family [β = 0.19; 95% CI (0.03, 0.36)], when health providers were able to explain things in ways that were easy to understand [β = 0.34; 95% CI (0.10, 0.59)] and knew about patients’ living conditions [β = 0.31; 95% CI (0.15, 0.47)]. Conclusions Our findings indicated patients received low levels of SMS. PACIC-M11 ratings were associated with age, ethnicity, educational level, difference between actual and expected consultation length, willingness to recommend the clinic and provider communication skills.


2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt Kroenke ◽  
Jingwei Wu ◽  
Matthew J. Bair ◽  
Teresa M. Damush ◽  
Erin E. Krebs ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document