scholarly journals Erratum to: Tree Height Influences Flight of Lesser Peachtree Borer and Peachtree Borer (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) Males

2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 481-482
Author(s):  
Ted E. Cottrell ◽  
D. L. Horton ◽  
J. Fuest
Insects ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 658
Author(s):  
Daniel L. Frank ◽  
Stephen Starcher ◽  
Rakesh S. Chandran

The peachtree borer, Synanthedon exitiosa, and lesser peachtree borer, S. pictipes, are economically important indirect pests of peach in West Virginia. The purpose of this 3-year study was to compare the efficacy of mating disruption and post-harvest trunk sprays of chlorpyrifos insecticide for control of this pest complex in a commercial peach orchard. Overall, Isomate PTB-Dual disruption dispensers applied at a rate of 371/ha significantly disrupted the male mate-finding behavior of S. exitiosa and S. pictipes. In addition, the infestation of peach trees by S. exitiosa larvae did not vary significantly between mating disruption and insecticide treated plots. Hot-spot maps of S. exitiosa infestation showed significant spatial clusters of infestation predominately near the perimeter of all orchard plots, or where trees were missing within and/or between rows. The generation of standard deviational ellipses revelated that the location of S. exitiosa infestations in orchard plots remained relatively constant between years, and were generally oriented in a north and easterly direction, which coincided with the prevailing wind direction. Although our data indicated that mating disruption can provide growers with an effective non-chemical alternative to chlorpyrifos trunk sprays, several variables may affect its long-term success in West Virginia peach orchards; most notably the presence of high population densities, problems with maintaining adequate pheromone coverage, and the need for area-wide implementation.


1991 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 218-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas G. Pfeiffer ◽  
Joella C. Killian ◽  
Edwin G. Rajotte ◽  
Larry A. Hull ◽  
Wendell J. Shows

1971 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 879-882 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. T. Y. Wong ◽  
H. Kamasaki ◽  
R. E. Dolphin ◽  
M. L. Cleveland ◽  
D. F. Ralston ◽  
...  

1977 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. E. Yonce ◽  
C. R. Gentry ◽  
J. H. Tumlinson ◽  
R. E. Doolittle ◽  
E. R. Mitchell ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 118 (6) ◽  
pp. 864-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.J. Puterka ◽  
R. Scorza ◽  
M.W. Brown

Damage by lesser Peachtree borer (LPB) (Synanthedon pictipes Grote & Robinson) and Leucostoma canker that had accumulated during 6 (Orchard A) and 8 (Orchard B) years were compared in peach (Prunus persica L.) and peach-almond [P. amygdalus (Mill.) D. A. Webb] hybrids. Afterward, the main trunk and scaffold limbs of the trees received 10 wounds 26 mm in diameter and a subset of these trees in Orchard A had wounds inoculated with Leucostoma persoonii Hohn. Before wounding, Leucostoma canker infection and LPB infestations that had accumulated for 6 to 8 years on peach-almond hybrids was ≈60% and 98% less than on peach in Orchard A and B, respectively. One month after wounding the trees, no significant differences in Leucostoma canker infection and LPB infestations were found among the peach-almond hybrids, treated or not treated with L. persoonii, or untreated peach. Yet, Leucostoma- treated and untreated peach-almond hybrids had 33% and 25% less Leucostoma canker and LPB, respectively, when compared with Leucostoma- treated peach. Ten months after wounding, peach-almond hybrids treated with L. persoonii still had significantly less Leucostoma canker (60%) and LPB (25%) when compared with Leucostoma- treated peach. Wound gumming and wound closure rates seemed to influence the degree of LPB infestation and Leucostoma canker. Based on these data, peach-almond hybrids could be valuable sources of resistance to LPB and Leucostoma canker.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document