Direct Measurements of Quantum Turbulence Induced by Second Sound Shock Pulses in Helium II

2005 ◽  
Vol 141 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 47-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. K. Hilton ◽  
S. W. Van. Sciver
2003 ◽  
Vol 329-333 ◽  
pp. 228-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
David K. Hilton ◽  
Steven W. Van Sciver

2019 ◽  
Vol 197 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 130-148
Author(s):  
E. Varga ◽  
M. J. Jackson ◽  
D. Schmoranzer ◽  
L. Skrbek

1989 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. v. Schwerdtner ◽  
G. Stamm ◽  
D. W. Schmidt

1954 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 381-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. R. Atkins ◽  
K. H. Hart

The second sound was in the form of a pulsed continuous wave with a pulse length of 1 to 2 msec, and a carrier frequency of 10 or 20 kc./s. The change in amplitude of the pulse was measured as the distance between the transmitter and the receiver was varied. To avoid boundary effects, no propagation tube was used and allowance had to be made for the spreading of the second sound beam. The attenuation was found to increase with increasing second sound amplitude. The attenuation extrapolated to zero amplitude had a finite value which increased rapidly as the temperature was lowered towards 1°K. Its order of magnitude was too large to be explained by viscosity effects, but was in good agreement with a thermal conductivity effect predicted by Khalatnikov.


1995 ◽  
Vol 283 ◽  
pp. 329-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen L. Henderson ◽  
Carlo F. Barenghi ◽  
Chris A. Jones

We solve the nonlinear two-fluid Hall–Vinen–Bekharevich–Khalatnikov equations of motion of helium II for the first time and investigate the configuration of quantized vortex lines in Taylor–Couette flow. The results are interpreted in terms of quantities which can be observed by measuring the attenuation of second sound. Comparison is made with existing experimental results.


1955 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. 1667-1672 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. Wheeler ◽  
C. H. Blakewood ◽  
C. T. Lane

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document