scholarly journals Integration of ecosystem services into a conceptual spatial planning framework based on a landscape ecology perspective

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 2047-2059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Babí Almenar ◽  
Benedetto Rugani ◽  
Davide Geneletti ◽  
Tim Brewer
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 825
Author(s):  
Richard leBrasseur

Most sustainable planning frameworks assess natural and social–economic landscape systems as separate entities, and our understanding of the interrelationships between them is incomplete. Landscape classification in urbanizing environments requires an integrated spatial planning approach to better address the United Nation’s sustainable development challenges. The objective of this research is to apply a multicriteria evaluation which ranked diverse ecosystem–service producing landscapes and synthesize the findings within a unique green infrastructure spatial planning framework. Local government stakeholder derived weighting and GIS classification were operated to map both the urban and natural landscapes of the Salt Lake City region of Utah, one of the most rapidly urbanizing areas in North America. Results were assimilated through five regional landscape typologies—Ecological, Hydrological, Recreational, Working Lands, and Community—and indicated those highest ranked landscape areas which provided multiple ecosystem services. These findings support collaborative decision making among diverse stakeholders with overlapping objectives and illustrates pathways to the development of ecosystem service criteria. This paper contributes to a better understanding of how to integrate data and visualize the strategic approaches required for sustainable planning and management, particularly in urban and urbanizing regions where complex socioecological landscapes predominate.


2021 ◽  
Vol 214 ◽  
pp. 104195
Author(s):  
Janneke van Oorschot ◽  
Benjamin Sprecher ◽  
Maarten van 't Zelfde ◽  
Peter M. van Bodegom ◽  
Alexander P.E. van Oudenhoven

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1287-1300 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Mascarenhas ◽  
Tomás B. Ramos ◽  
Dagmar Haase ◽  
Rui Santos

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 566-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis Turkelboom ◽  
Michael Leone ◽  
Sander Jacobs ◽  
Eszter Kelemen ◽  
Marina García-Llorente ◽  
...  

Environments ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rémi Jaligot ◽  
Jérôme Chenal

Integrating the concept of ecosystem services (ES) into spatial planning is an opportunity to make land use and management choices that maximize the delivery of multiple ES. The assessment of social demand can be useful for the identification of priority areas or potential conflicts among stakeholders. We used Q-methodology to understand stakeholder perspectives on ES to facilitate their integration into spatial planning in the canton of Vaud, Switzerland. Three perspectives, utilitarian, cultural and protective, were analyzed and used to discuss potential implications for spatial planning. First, ecosystem multifunctionality and synergies among ES should be emphasized. Second, the food production system should move away from a productive-only approach, to a system that protects soils and their functions. Providing a paradigm change, arable land could be protected to the same level as forests and farmers could be incentivized further to change their practices. Finally, our findings show a potential over-interpretation of the importance of cultural ES in current planning policies, as most participants would be ready to change their behaviors to preserve biological functions. It would be useful to conduct a similar study in other cantons to ensure that the results are fully representative of the current situation in Switzerland.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document