Do measures of depressive symptoms function differently in people with spinal cord injury versus primary care patients: the CES-D, PHQ-9, and PROMIS®-D

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karon F. Cook ◽  
Michael A. Kallen ◽  
Charles Bombardier ◽  
Alyssa M. Bamer ◽  
Seung W. Choi ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 702-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aisha Lofters ◽  
Maha Chaudhry ◽  
Morgan Slater ◽  
Andree Schuler ◽  
James Milligan ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 483-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin N. Alschuler ◽  
Mark P. Jensen ◽  
Sarah J. Sullivan-Singh ◽  
Soo Borson ◽  
Amanda E. Smith ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 259 (6) ◽  
pp. 1142-1150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katayun Hassanpour ◽  
◽  
Sabina Hotz-Boendermaker ◽  
Petra Dokladal ◽  
Armin Curt

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-219
Author(s):  
James Milligan ◽  
Stephen Burns ◽  
Suzanne Groah ◽  
Jeremy Howcroft

Objective: Provide guidance for preventive health and health maintenance after spinal cord injury (SCI) for primary care providers (PCPs). Main message: Individuals with SCI may not receive the same preventive health care as the general population. Additionally, SCI-related secondary conditions may put their health at risk. SCI is considered a complex condition associated with many barriers to receiving quality primary care. Attention to routine preventive care and the unique health considerations of persons with SCI can improve health and quality of life and may prevent unnecessary health care utilization. Conclusion: PCPs are experts in preventive care and continuity of care, however individuals with SCI may not receive the same preventive care due to numerous barriers. This article serves as a quick reference for PCPs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-165
Author(s):  
Philippines Cabahug ◽  
Charles Pickard ◽  
Travis Edmiston ◽  
Jesse A. Lieberman

Background: Muscle spasticity is a common sequela of spinal cord injury (SCI) that may impact daily function. Spasticity dynamically varies and is an important physiologic response to illness or other stressors. The challenge for the general practitioner is in recognizing, treating, and developing an effective plan focused on the patient’s individual goals. Objective: To provide the general practitioner with a basic contextual, diagnostic, and therapeutic approach to spasticity management for individuals with neurologic injury such as SCI. Discussion: Muscle spasticity can be disabling and can be managed effectively by using a comprehensive approach. We discuss a representative case and the assessment and planning for individuals with SCI and spasticity. Through an understanding of pathophysiology, careful history taking, and physical exam, a cause for increased spasticity can be identified, such as infection, constipation, or pregnancy. Symptomatology of these triggers is often quite different in the SCI population than in the general population. Management includes the treatment of this causative stressor as well as the thoughtful management of spasticity itself. Conclusion: Muscle spasticity is dynamic and requires a patient-centered approach. The general practitioner can play a key role in recognizing and treating spasticity in an individual with SCI. Comprehensive management to meet patient and caregiver goals involves primary care providers, specialists, and allied health practitioners.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document