Coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire: validation study of the Serbian version

Author(s):  
Nemanja Aleksic ◽  
Svetozar Putnik ◽  
Sara Schroter ◽  
Vedrana Pavlovic ◽  
Uros Bumbasirevic ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shamsaddin Niknami ◽  
FarkhondehAmin Shokravi ◽  
SedighehSadat Tavafian ◽  
MohammadGholami Fesharaki ◽  
MohammadReza Jafari ◽  
...  

Injury ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Taylor Beatty ◽  
Dr. Mark Gillett ◽  
Maura Desmond ◽  
Samantha Lee ◽  
Dr. Sarah Wilks ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bojana Matejić ◽  
Miodrag Milenović ◽  
Darija Kisić Tepavčević ◽  
Dušica Simić ◽  
Tatjana Pekmezović ◽  
...  

We report findings from a validation study of the translated and culturally adapted Serbian version of Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS), for a sample of anesthesiologists working in the tertiary healthcare. The results showed the sufficient overall reliability (Cronbach’sα= 0.72) of the scores (items 1–22). The results of Bartlett’s test of sphericity (χ2= 1983.75, df = 231,p<0.001) and Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy (0.866) provided solid justification for factor analysis. In order to increase sensitivity of this questionnaire, we performed unfitted factor analysis model (eigenvalue greater than 1) which enabled us to extract the most suitable factor structure for our study instrument. The exploratory factor analysis model revealed five factors with eigenvalues greater than 1.0, explaining 62.0% of cumulative variance. Velicer’s MAP test has supported five-factor model with the smallest average squared correlation of 0,184. This study indicated that Serbian version of the MBI-HSS is a reliable and valid instrument to measure burnout among a population of anesthesiologists. Results confirmed strong psychometric characteristics of the study instrument, with recommendations for interpretation of two new factors that may be unique to the Serbian version of the MBI-HSS.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siw A Lillevik ◽  
Sara Schroter ◽  
Tove A Hanssen

Background: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires are increasingly used as outcome measures in research and clinical practice to assess treatment effectiveness in coronary heart disease (CHD) alongside traditional outcome measures. The Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to evaluate health outcomes and HRQOL before and after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Aim: To translate the CROQ-PCI from English into Norwegian and test its psychometric properties. Methods: Independent forward and backward translation was done following international guidelines. The CROQ was then pretested with both healthcare professionals and patients before the psychometric properties were field tested in a sample of patients who had undergone PCI. Psychometric testing included an evaluation of: acceptability; tests of scaling assumptions; reliability; content validity; construct validity based on within-scale analyses; and construct validity based on comparisons with external measures. Results: 171 of 258 (66%) invited patients participated. The CROQ was acceptable to patients (low proportion of missing data and good response rate), reliable (good internal consistency and test–retest reliability for all scales), had good content validity (reported by both patients and healthcare professionals) and good construct validity (convergent validity with the SF-12 and Seattle Angina Questionnaire, known groups validity and factor analysis). Conclusion: The Norwegian version of CROQ-PCI is a reliable and valid PROM for assessing HRQOL in CHD patients. Further testing of its responsiveness and ability to detect change is needed before recommending its use in Norwegian clinical practice and research.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 477-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. FRASER ◽  
B. C. DELANEY ◽  
A. C. FORD ◽  
M. QUME ◽  
P. MOAYYEDI

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document