Identification and welfare evaluation in sequential sampling models

Author(s):  
Jetlir Duraj ◽  
Yi-Hsuan Lin
1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 713-725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itiel E. Dror ◽  
Beth Basola ◽  
Jerome R. Busemeyer

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 813-832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Voss ◽  
Veronika Lerche ◽  
Ulf Mertens ◽  
Jochen Voss

2020 ◽  
Vol 94 ◽  
pp. 102298
Author(s):  
Thomas Bose ◽  
Angelo Pirrone ◽  
Andreagiovanni Reina ◽  
James A.R. Marshall

2020 ◽  
Vol 136 ◽  
pp. 107261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Miletić ◽  
Russell J. Boag ◽  
Birte U. Forstmann

2017 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. 101-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam F. Osth ◽  
Simon Dennis ◽  
Andrew Heathcote

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Lisi ◽  
Michael J. Morgan ◽  
Joshua A. Solomon

AbstractPerceptual decisions often require the integration of noisy sensory evidence over time. This process is formalized with sequential sampling models, where evidence is accumulated up to a decision threshold before a choice is made. Although classical accounts grounded in cognitive psychology tend to consider the process of decision formation and the preparation of the motor response as occurring serially, neurophysiological studies have proposed that decision formation and response preparation occur in parallel and are inseparable (Cisek, 2007; Shadlen et al., 2008). To address this serial vs. parallel debate, we developed a behavioural, reverse correlation protocol, in which the stimuli that influence perceptual decisions can be distinguished from the stimuli that influence motor responses. We show that the temporal integration windows supporting these two processes are distinct and largely non-overlapping, suggesting that they proceed in a serial or cascaded fashion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document