scholarly journals Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ragnhild Stokke Lundetræ ◽  
Ingvild West Saxvig ◽  
Sverre Lehmann ◽  
Bjørn Bjorvatn
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Anxiety And Depression ◽  
Cpap Adherence ◽  
Cpap Treatment ◽  
Obstructive Sleep

Abstract Purpose The objective was to assess the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We hypothesized a decrease in symptoms at follow-up, but that improvement relied on CPAP adherence. Methods The sample comprised 468 patients (mean age 55.5 years (SD = 12.0), 72% men) with OSA who received CPAP at a Norwegian hospital. OSA was diagnosed according to standard respiratory polygraphy. Mean baseline respiratory event index (REI) was 28.4 (SD = 20.6). Symptoms of anxiety and depression were assessed prior to CPAP treatment and at follow-up after a median of 20 weeks, range 6–52 weeks, with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Patients were classified as CPAP adherent (≥ 4 h per night) or non-adherent (< 4 h per night). Results There was a significant decrease in anxiety scores from baseline (mean = 5.16, SD = 3.94) to follow-up (mean = 4.76, SD = 3.81), p < 0.001. Similarly, depression scores decreased from baseline (mean = 4.31, SD = 3.66) to follow-up (mean = 3.89, SD = 3.69), p < 0.001. Cohen’s d (0.19 and 0.18, respectively) indicated small effect sizes. The reduction in anxiety scores did not depend on CPAP adherence (no interaction effect F(1, 466) = 0.422, p = 0.516), whereas the reduction in depression scores were seen only in the CPAP adherent group (interaction effect F(1, 466) = 7.738, p = 0.006). Conclusions We found a decrease in symptoms of anxiety and depression from baseline to follow-up of CPAP treatment. The improvement in symptoms of depression was depending on CPAP adherence. This underlines the importance of adherence for optimal effect of CPAP treatment.

scholarly journals Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Symptoms and Prevalence of Insomnia in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Longitudinal Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ragnhild Stokke Lundetræ ◽  
Ingvild West Saxvig ◽  
Harald Aurlien ◽  
Sverre Lehmann ◽  
Bjørn Bjorvatn
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Chronic Insomnia ◽  
Cpap Adherence ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Insomnia Symptoms

ObjectiveObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and insomnia are the two most common sleep disorders. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is considered first-line treatment for OSA. In the present study, we assess the effect of CPAP on symptoms and prevalence of insomnia in patients with OSA. We hypothesized a decrease in insomnia symptoms from CPAP initiation to follow-up, and that this decrease would depend on CPAP adherence.Materials and methodsThe sample included 442 patients diagnosed with OSA [mean age 54.9 years (SD = 12.1), 74.4% males] who started treatment with CPAP at a university hospital. OSA was diagnosed according to standard respiratory polygraphy. Mean apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was 30.1 (SD = 21.1) at baseline. Insomnia was assessed prior to CPAP treatment (baseline) and at follow-up after a median of 19.9 weeks (range 6–52 weeks) with the Bergen Insomnia Scale (BIS). CPAP adherence was defined as an average use of ≥ 4 h per night, whereas non-adherence was defined as &lt; 4 h per night.ResultsThere was a significant decrease in BIS scores from baseline (mean = 18.8, SD = 9.8) to follow-up (mean = 12.9, SD = 9.9), p &lt; 0.001. Cohen’s d(0.65) indicated a moderate effect size. The reduction in BIS scores was depending on CPAP adherence (interaction effect F(1,440) = 12.4, p &lt; 0.001), with larger reduction in the adherent group than in the non-adherent group. The proportion of patients with chronic insomnia was significantly reduced from 51.1% at baseline to 33.0% at follow-up (p &lt; 0.001).ConclusionOverall, there was a significant reduction in insomnia symptoms from baseline to follow-up. The improvement was significant in both adherence groups, but the degree of improvement was larger among patients who were adherent to CPAP. Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in the prevalence of chronic insomnia at follow-up compared to baseline. This suggests that CPAP effectively reduces both the presence of insomnia and the severity of insomnia symptoms in some patients with OSA.

scholarly journals Long-term obstructive sleep apnea therapy: a 10-year follow-up of mandibular advancement device and continuous positive airway pressure

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 353-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia A. M. Uniken Venema ◽  
Michiel H. J. Doff ◽  
Dilyana Joffe-Sokolova ◽  
Peter J. Wijkstra ◽  
Johannes H. van der Hoeven ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Mandibular Advancement Device ◽  
Mandibular Advancement ◽  
Obstructive Sleep

scholarly journals Oral Appliance Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: A 2-Year Follow-up

SLEEP ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 1289-1296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michiel H. J. Doff ◽  
Aarnoud Hoekema ◽  
Peter J. Wijkstra ◽  
Johannes H. van der Hoeven ◽  
James J. R. Huddleston Slater ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Sleep Apnea Syndrome ◽  
Oral Appliance ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Apnea Syndrome

Abstract P255: Resistance Hypertension And Achievement Of Target Blood Pressure Level By Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Long Therapy In Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Hypertension ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 78 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oksana Rekovets ◽  
Yuriy Sirenko ◽  
Nina Krushynska ◽  
Olena Torbas ◽  
Svitlana Kushnir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Arterial Hypertension ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Resistant Arterial Hypertension

The aim was to assess the arterial stiffness changes in patients with resistant arterial hypertension (AH) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and possibilities of its correction by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)-therapy. Design: In 10 month follow-up study were included 46 patients with RAH, who were divided into groups: 1-st - patients with RAH and moderate to severe OSA on CPAP (n=21); 2-nd - patients with RAH and moderate to severe OSA without CPAP (n=25). They underwent somnography by dual-channel portable monitor device, office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, echocardiography and applanation tonometry. All patients received similar antihypertensive therapy according to 2013 ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Results: Patients with RAH and OSA (mean apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) 36.5±2.7 event h-1) in comparison with patients with RAH without OSA (mean AHI 3.4±0.2 event h-1) had significantly higher body mass index (34.2±0.7 vs 31.6±0.7 kg m-2, P<0.05), uric acid level (6.7±0.1 vs 5.6±0.4 mg dl-1, P<0,05)). Patients with RAH and OSA in comparison with patients with RAH without OSA had higher carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWVcf) (12.1±0.5 vs 10.2 m s-1, P<0,05) and central systolic blood pressure (CSBP) (143.8±2.7 vs 136.2±3.4 mm Hg, P<0,05). During 10 months follow-up in patients with RAH and moderate and sever OSA on CPAP-therapy there were significantly decrease of PWVcf (from 12.1±0.5 to 10.5±0.5 m s-1, P<0,05), decrease office systolic blood pressure (from 147.8±3.7 to 136.7±2.8 mm Hg; P<0,05) and diastolic blood pressure (from 96.8±3.5 to 87.0±3.3 mm Hg; P<0,05) with achievement of target levels in 67,2% patients. Central systolic BP decreased (from 143.8±2.7 to 137.7±2.8 mm Hg; P<0,05). Conclusion: The combination of therapy continuous positive airway pressure with antihypertensive treatment in patients with resistant arterial hypertension and moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea improved achievement of target blood pressure, decreased arterial stiffness and decreased central blood pressure.

scholarly journals Do Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Patients Underestimate Their Daytime Symptoms before Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment?

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 216-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle Leclerc ◽  
Yves Lacasse ◽  
Diane Page ◽  
Frédéric Sériès
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Sleep Apnea Syndrome ◽  
Cpap Treatment ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Pretreatment Score

BACKGROUND: Daytime somnolence is an important feature of the obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) hypopnea syndrome and is usually subjectively assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS).OBJECTIVE: To compare the scores of the ESS and different domains of the Quebec Sleep Questionnaire (QSQ) assessed before and after the first months of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment, as well as retrospectively without treatment.METHODS: The ESS score and domain scores of the QSQ were obtained before and after a three-month period of CPAP treatment using a retrospective assessment of the pretreatment scores in 76 untreated OSA patients.RESULTS: Fifty-two patients completed the study. The ESS and QSQ scores significantly improved following CPAP therapy. Retrospective evaluation of the ESS score was significantly worse than pre- and post-treatment values (mean [± SD] pretreatment score 11.0±4.8; retrospective pretreatment score 13.5±5.1). Such differences were not observed in any domain of the QSQ, including the domain assessing hypersomnolence.CONCLUSION: OSA patients underestimated their sleepiness according to the most widely used instrument to assess hypersomnolence. This finding may not be observed with other methods used to assess OSA-related symptoms such as quality of life questionnaires.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document