scholarly journals Role of spousal involvement in continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) adherence in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 213-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salma Batool-Anwar ◽  
◽  
Carol Baldwin ◽  
Shira Fass ◽  
Stuart Quan
SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. A221-A221
Author(s):  
Christina Finch ◽  
Robert Bercovitch

Abstract Introduction Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is an effective treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) in children. However, adherence to CPAP therapy is often suboptimal. CPAP telemonitoring with automated feedback messaging has been shown to improved adherence in adults with OSA, but has not been widely studied as an intervention for children with OSA. This pilot study was conducted to investigate if feedback messaging could similarly improve CPAP adherence in children. Methods Pediatric OSA subjects (ages 11–17) with poor CPAP compliance or newly prescribed CPAP were selected from an outpatient Sleep Medicine clinic to receive weekly text messages with scripted feedback on CPAP adherence. Patients already meeting adherence goals were excluded from the study. Parental consent was obtained and participants were given the option to have text messages sent to parents or directly to the patient. Adherence was monitored over a four-month intervention period and compared to pre-intervention usage as a self-matched control. Total hours of use per month and numbers of days used per month were collected through daily remote CPAP monitoring. Average hours per use and average daily use per 30-day period were additional adherence measurements calculated. Data was analyzed using two-tailed paired T-tests with level of significance set at p<0.05. Results There was no significant change in CPAP adherence (p>.05) after initiation of weekly feedback messaging for the five patients included in the study. No participant, before or after intervention, met the Medicare definition of compliance (≥4hr nightly use for ≥ 70% of nights) and average adherence declined following intervention. Conclusion In a small pilot study, weekly feedback text messaging did not improve CPAP adherence in pediatric patients with OSA. This finding contrasts with larger studies in adult patients with OSA that have demonstrated improved CPAP adherence with automated feedback messaging. With the increasing use of telemedicine for CPAP follow-up, new strategies to successfully utilize this approach in the pediatric population may be needed. Support (if any) None.


2012 ◽  
Vol 186 (9) ◽  
pp. 909-916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel-Angel Martínez-García ◽  
Francisco Campos-Rodríguez ◽  
Pablo Catalán-Serra ◽  
Juan-José Soler-Cataluña ◽  
Carmen Almeida-Gonzalez ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ragnhild Stokke Lundetræ ◽  
Ingvild West Saxvig ◽  
Harald Aurlien ◽  
Sverre Lehmann ◽  
Bjørn Bjorvatn

ObjectiveObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and insomnia are the two most common sleep disorders. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is considered first-line treatment for OSA. In the present study, we assess the effect of CPAP on symptoms and prevalence of insomnia in patients with OSA. We hypothesized a decrease in insomnia symptoms from CPAP initiation to follow-up, and that this decrease would depend on CPAP adherence.Materials and methodsThe sample included 442 patients diagnosed with OSA [mean age 54.9 years (SD = 12.1), 74.4% males] who started treatment with CPAP at a university hospital. OSA was diagnosed according to standard respiratory polygraphy. Mean apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was 30.1 (SD = 21.1) at baseline. Insomnia was assessed prior to CPAP treatment (baseline) and at follow-up after a median of 19.9 weeks (range 6–52 weeks) with the Bergen Insomnia Scale (BIS). CPAP adherence was defined as an average use of ≥ 4 h per night, whereas non-adherence was defined as < 4 h per night.ResultsThere was a significant decrease in BIS scores from baseline (mean = 18.8, SD = 9.8) to follow-up (mean = 12.9, SD = 9.9), p < 0.001. Cohen’s d(0.65) indicated a moderate effect size. The reduction in BIS scores was depending on CPAP adherence (interaction effect F(1,440) = 12.4, p < 0.001), with larger reduction in the adherent group than in the non-adherent group. The proportion of patients with chronic insomnia was significantly reduced from 51.1% at baseline to 33.0% at follow-up (p < 0.001).ConclusionOverall, there was a significant reduction in insomnia symptoms from baseline to follow-up. The improvement was significant in both adherence groups, but the degree of improvement was larger among patients who were adherent to CPAP. Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in the prevalence of chronic insomnia at follow-up compared to baseline. This suggests that CPAP effectively reduces both the presence of insomnia and the severity of insomnia symptoms in some patients with OSA.


Author(s):  
Ragnhild Stokke Lundetræ ◽  
Ingvild West Saxvig ◽  
Sverre Lehmann ◽  
Bjørn Bjorvatn

Abstract Purpose The objective was to assess the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We hypothesized a decrease in symptoms at follow-up, but that improvement relied on CPAP adherence. Methods The sample comprised 468 patients (mean age 55.5 years (SD = 12.0), 72% men) with OSA who received CPAP at a Norwegian hospital. OSA was diagnosed according to standard respiratory polygraphy. Mean baseline respiratory event index (REI) was 28.4 (SD = 20.6). Symptoms of anxiety and depression were assessed prior to CPAP treatment and at follow-up after a median of 20 weeks, range 6–52 weeks, with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Patients were classified as CPAP adherent (≥ 4 h per night) or non-adherent (< 4 h per night). Results There was a significant decrease in anxiety scores from baseline (mean = 5.16, SD = 3.94) to follow-up (mean = 4.76, SD = 3.81), p < 0.001. Similarly, depression scores decreased from baseline (mean = 4.31, SD = 3.66) to follow-up (mean = 3.89, SD = 3.69), p < 0.001. Cohen’s d (0.19 and 0.18, respectively) indicated small effect sizes. The reduction in anxiety scores did not depend on CPAP adherence (no interaction effect F(1, 466) = 0.422, p = 0.516), whereas the reduction in depression scores were seen only in the CPAP adherent group (interaction effect F(1, 466) = 7.738, p = 0.006). Conclusions We found a decrease in symptoms of anxiety and depression from baseline to follow-up of CPAP treatment. The improvement in symptoms of depression was depending on CPAP adherence. This underlines the importance of adherence for optimal effect of CPAP treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document