Conversion of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) for Biliary Reflux Resistant to Medical Treatment: Lessons Learned from a Retrospective Series of 2780 Consecutive Patients Undergoing OAGB

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 2093-2098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Radwan Kassir ◽  
Niccolo Petrucciani ◽  
Tarek Debs ◽  
Gildas Juglard ◽  
Francesco Martini ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nienke Slagter ◽  
Jonne Hopman ◽  
Anna G. Altenburg ◽  
Loek J. M. de Heide ◽  
Ewoud H. Jutte ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 2598-2605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leïla M’Harzi ◽  
Jean-Marc Chevallier ◽  
Anais Certain ◽  
Gwennhaël Autret ◽  
Guillaume Levenson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niccolo Petrucciani ◽  
Francesco Martini ◽  
Radwan Kassir ◽  
Gildas Juglard ◽  
Celine Hamid ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Internal hernia (IH) represents a relatively common and well-known complication after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. IH after one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is less frequent and rarely reported in the literature. This study presents a series of IH after OAGB observed in a high-volume bariatric center. Methods Data of patients who underwent OAGB with an afferent limb of 150 cm between May 2010 and September 2019 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Data of patients undergoing surgery for IH during follow-up were collected and analyzed. Results Ninety-six patients out of 3368 with a history of OAGB had intestinal incarceration in the Petersen’s orifice (2.8%). Specificity and sensitivity of computed tomography scans in the diagnosis of IH were 59% and 76%, respectively. The mean timeframe between OAGB and surgery for IH was 21.9±18.3 months. Mean body mass index at the time of IH surgery was 24.7 ± 3.6. Surgery was completed laparoscopically in 96.8% of cases. Nine patients (9.3%) had signs of bowel hypovascularization. In all patients, the herniated bowel was repositioned, and the Petersen’s orifice was closed, without the need for bowel resection. Mean hospital stay was 1.9 ± 4.8 days. The postoperative morbidity rate was 8.3%. Long-term IH relapse was observed in 14 patients; signs of bowel hypovascularization due to incarceration in a small orifice was observed in eight of these patients (57%). Conclusions Incidence of IH after OAGB is 2.8%. IH is associated with a low rate of bowel ischemia and the need for intestinal resection.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 1119-1122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthieu Bruzzi ◽  
Henri Duboc ◽  
Caroline Gronnier ◽  
Dominique Rainteau ◽  
Anne Couvelard ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 545-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthieu Bruzzi ◽  
Jean-Marc Chevallier ◽  
Sébastien Czernichow

Heliyon ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. e07705
Author(s):  
Giovanni Scavone ◽  
Federica Castelli ◽  
Daniele Carmelo Caltabiano ◽  
Maria Vittoria Raciti ◽  
Corrado Ini’ ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jean-Charles Lafarge ◽  
Denis-Jean David ◽  
Cédric Carbonneil

IntroductionOne anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has become a widespread technique over the last few years in France, without any prior assessment and despite existing controversies among bariatric surgeons. An older bypass technique for treating obesity, the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), is available and reimbursed, having been assessed and approved for use in 2005. In 2019, the French Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) assessed OAGB for the treatment of severe and massive obesity. This assessment, the first in the world, was undertaken for OAGBs carried out with a 200- or 150-centimeter biliopancreatic-limb (BP-limb) length.MethodsA systematic review (SR) of the literature and consultation of a working group consisting of both healthcare professionals (clinician and surgeons) and patients were carried out. The primary aim of our assessment was to determine whether the OAGB technique can replace RYGB. The efficacy and safety profile of OAGB was compared with RYGB in adult patients with massive, severe obesity. Complications and postoperative follow up specific to OAGB were identified.ResultsThe three selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) could not confirm the superiority or the non-inferiority of OAGB, compared with RYGB, on the selected efficacy endpoints of weight loss, resolution of comorbidities, and quality of life. Adverse events reported for OAGB included severe nutritional complications and bile reflux that could potentially lead to lower esophageal cancer. In one RCT, the frequency of serious adverse events in the OAGB group was almost two times higher than in the RYGB group.ConclusionsHAS considered that OAGB carried out with a longer (200 centimeter) BP-limb is not a validated technique for the surgical treatment of massive, severe obesity. Thus, it cannot be considered an alternative to RYGB. There were insufficient data available on OAGB performed with a 150-centimeter BP-limb. Thus, HAS recommended undertaking a multicenter RCT to assess the efficacy and safety of OAGB. Patients who have already undergone OAGB should receive the same follow up as patients who have received RYGB, including close monitoring for nutritional complications and lower esophageal cancer and an endoscopic examination five years after surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document