scholarly journals Retraction Note of “Baire property and axiom of choice”

2020 ◽  
Vol 240 (1) ◽  
pp. 443-443
Author(s):  
Saharon Shelah
1993 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haim Judah ◽  
Saharon Shelah

1988 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 1027-1035
Author(s):  
Chris Freiling ◽  
T. H. Payne

Dowker [1] raised the question of the existence of filters such that for every coloring (partition) of the underlying index set I with two colors there is a relation R on I which (i) is fat (in the sense that sets of the form {y Є I∣xRy} are in the filter) and (ii) has no bichromatic symmetric pairs (i.e., distinct indices x and y such that x R y and y R x). Additionally, he required that the filter have no anti-symmetric fat relation, for such a relation would vacuously satisfy (i) and (ii). The question of the existence of Dowker filters has been studied more recently by Rudin [3], [4], who conjectures [3] that such filters do not exist.For ZFC the problem remains open. However, Example 2 of this paper shows that one can construct a Dowker filter provided one drops the axiom of choice in favor of the Baire Property (BP) axiom which is known to be incompatible with ZFC but relatively consistent with ZF. In fact, the filter constructed is super-Dowker in the sense that (ii) can be replaced by the requirement that all components of all symmetric pairs have the same color. But, in ZFC the existence of a super-Dowker filter implies the existence of a measurable cardinal.Let F be a filter on an index set I. A set will be called big, small, or medium depending on whether F contains that set, its compliment, or neither, respectively. We define five cardinals associated with F:α denotes the smallest cardinal such that there is a family of α big sets whose intersection is not big.ν denotes the smallest cardinal such that there is a family of ν big sets whose intersection is small.


Author(s):  
Alexander R. Pruss

This is a mainly technical chapter concerning the causal embodiment of the Axiom of Choice from set theory. The Axiom of Choice powered a construction of an infinite fair lottery in Chapter 4 and a die-rolling strategy in Chapter 5. For those applications to work, there has to be a causally implementable (though perhaps not compatible with our laws of nature) way to implement the Axiom of Choice—and, for our purposes, it is ideal if that involves infinite causal histories, so the causal finitist can reject it. Such a construction is offered. Moreover, other paradoxes involving the Axiom of Choice are given, including two Dutch Book paradoxes connected with the Banach–Tarski paradox. Again, all this is argued to provide evidence for causal finitism.


2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
JANUSZ BRZDȨK

AbstractWe give some general results concerning continuity of measurable homomorphisms of topological groups. As a consequence we show that a Christensen measurable homomorphism of a Polish abelian group into a locally compact topological group is continuous. We also obtain similar results for the universally measurable homomorphisms and the homomorphisms that have the Baire property.


2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 661-671
Author(s):  
Jacek Hejduk ◽  
Anna Loranty

Abstract This paper contains some results connected with topologies generated by lower and semi-lower density operators. We show that in some measurable spaces (𝑋, 𝑆, 𝐽) there exists a semi-lower density operator which does not generate a topology. We investigate some properties of nowhere dense sets, meager sets and σ-algebras of sets having the Baire property, associated with the topology generated by a semi-lower density operator.


Author(s):  
Cesare Gallozzi

Abstract We introduce a family of (k, h)-interpretations for 2 ≤ k ≤ ∞ and 1 ≤ h ≤ ∞ of constructive set theory into type theory, in which sets and formulas are interpreted as types of homotopy level k and h, respectively. Depending on the values of the parameters k and h, we are able to interpret different theories, like Aczel’s CZF and Myhill’s CST. We also define a proposition-as-hproposition interpretation in the context of logic-enriched type theories. The rest of the paper is devoted to characterising and analysing the interpretations considered. The formulas valid in the prop-as-hprop interpretation are characterised in terms of the axiom of unique choice. We also analyse the interpretations of CST into homotopy type theory, providing a comparative analysis with Aczel’s interpretation. This is done by formulating in a logic-enriched type theory the key principles used in the proofs of the two interpretations. Finally, we characterise a class of sentences valid in the (k, ∞)-interpretations in terms of the ΠΣ axiom of choice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document