The Role of Neck Dissection in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 611-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Hamoir ◽  
Sandra Schmitz ◽  
Vincent Gregoire
2012 ◽  
Vol 270 (4) ◽  
pp. 1195-1202 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Thomas Robbins ◽  
Alfio Ferlito ◽  
Jatin P. Shah ◽  
Marc Hamoir ◽  
Robert P. Takes ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Boros ◽  
Pierre Blanchard ◽  
Arlette Dade ◽  
Philippe Gorphe ◽  
Ingrid Breuskin ◽  
...  

Oral Oncology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Hamoir ◽  
Alfio Ferlito ◽  
Sandra Schmitz ◽  
François-Xavier Hanin ◽  
Juliette Thariat ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 133 (8) ◽  
pp. 886-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Jin Lee ◽  
Kee Hwan Kwon ◽  
Eun Jae Chung ◽  
Il Seok Park ◽  
Jin Hwan Kim ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Areeg Elmusrati ◽  
Justin Wang ◽  
Cun-Yu Wang

AbstractHead and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), an aggressive malignancy, is characterized by high morbidity and low survival rates with limited therapeutic options outside of regional surgery, conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy, and irradiation. Increasing studies have supported the synergistic role of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in cancer advancement. The immune system, in particular, plays a key role in surveillance against the initiation, development, and progression of HNSCC. The understanding of how neoplastic cells evolve and evade the immune system whether through self-immunogenicity manipulation, or expression of immunosuppressive mediators, provides the foundation for the development of advanced therapies. Furthermore, the crosstalk between cancer cells and the host immune system have a detrimental effect on the TME promoting angiogenesis, proliferation, and metastasis. This review provides a recent insight into the role of the key inflammatory cells infiltrating the TME, with a focus on reviewing immunological principles related to HNSCC, as cancer immunosurveillance and immune escape, including a brief overview of current immunotherapeutic strategies and ongoing clinical trials.


Author(s):  
K Devaraja ◽  
K Pujary ◽  
B Ramaswamy ◽  
D R Nayak ◽  
N Kumar ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Lymph node yield is an important prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Variability in neck dissection sampling techniques has not been studied as a determinant of lymph node yield. Methods This retrospective study used lymph node yield and average nodes per level to compare level-by-level and en bloc neck dissection sampling methods, in primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cases operated between March 2017 and February 2020. Results From 123 patients, 182 neck dissections were analysed, of which 133 were selective and the rest were comprehensive: 55 had level-by-level sampling and 127 had undergone en bloc dissection. The level-by-level method yielded more nodes in all neck dissections combined (20 vs 17; p = 0.097), but the difference was significant only for the subcohort of selective neck dissection (18.5 vs 15; p = 0.011). However, the gain in average nodes per level achieved by level-by-level sampling was significant in both groups (4.2 vs 3.33 and 4.4 vs 3, respectively; both p < 0.001). Conclusion Sampling of cervical lymph nodes level-by-level yields more nodes than the en bloc technique. Further studies could verify whether neck dissection sampling technique has any impact on survival rates.


Author(s):  
Kuauhyama Luna-Ortiz ◽  
Nancy Reynoso-Noverón ◽  
Luis C. Zacarías-Ramón ◽  
Zelik Luna-Peteuil ◽  
Dorian Y. García-Ortega

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document