A New Digital Preoperative Planning Method for Total Hip Arthroplasties

Worldwide tendencies to perform large numbers of total hip arthroplasties in the treatment of osteoarthritis are observable over a long period of time. Every year, there is an observable increase in the number of these procedures performed. The outcomes are good but not ideal, especially in groups of patients with spine problems. In recent years, a growing interest in this field may be observed, since spinopelvic alignment seems to have a significant impact on total hip replacement (THR) results. The aim of this study is to describe relations between spine and pelvic alignment and provide practical information about its impact on total hip replacement. The authors performed a literature review based on PubMed, Embase, and Medline and provide practical guidelines based on them and their own experience.

Download Full-text

Digital Versus Analogue Preoperative Planning of Total Hip Arthroplasties

The Journal of Arthroplasty ◽

10.1016/j.arth.2006.07.013 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 22 (6) ◽

pp. 866-870 ◽

Cited By ~ 42

Author(s):

Bertram The ◽

Nico Verdonschot ◽

Jim R. van Horn ◽

Peter M.A. van Ooijen ◽

Ron L. Diercks

Keyword(s):

Preoperative Planning ◽

Total Hip ◽

Hip Arthroplasties

Download Full-text

Value of 3D Preoperative Planning for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Based on Biplanar Weightbearing Radiographs

BioMed Research International ◽

10.1155/2019/1932191 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 2019 ◽

pp. 1-7 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Y. Knafo ◽

F. Houfani ◽

B. Zaharia ◽

F. Egrise ◽

I. Clerc-Urmès ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Preoperative Planning ◽

Femoral Stem ◽

Leg Length ◽

Femoral Offset ◽

Postoperative Result ◽

Total Hip ◽

Planning Software ◽

Navigated Surgery

Two-dimensional (2D) planning on standard radiographs for total hip arthroplasty may not be sufficiently accurate to predict implant sizing or restore leg length and femoral offset, whereas 3D planning avoids magnification and projection errors. Furthermore, weightbearing measures are not available with computed tomography (CT) and leg length and offset are rarely checked postoperatively using any imaging modality. Navigation can usually achieve a surgical plan precisely, but the choice of that plan remains key, which is best guided by preoperative planning. The study objectives were therefore to (1) evaluate the accuracy of stem/cup size prediction using dedicated 3D planning software based on biplanar radiographic imaging under weightbearing and (2) compare the preplanned leg length and femoral offset with the postoperative result. This single-centre, single-surgeon prospective study consisted of a cohort of 33 patients operated on over 24 months. The routine clinical workflow consisted of preoperative biplanar weightbearing imaging, 3D surgical planning, navigated surgery to execute the plan, and postoperative biplanar imaging to verify the radiological outcomes in 3D weightbearing. 3D planning was performed with the dedicated hipEOS® planning software to determine stem and cup size and position, plus 3D anatomical and functional parameters, in particular variations in leg length and femoral offset. Component size planning accuracy was 94% (31/33) within one size for the femoral stem and 100% (33/33) within one size for the acetabular cup. There were no significant differences between planned versus implanted femoral stem size or planned versus measured changes in leg length or offset. Cup size did differ significantly, tending towards implanting one size larger when there was a difference. Biplanar radiographs plus hipEOS planning software showed good reliability for predicting implant size, leg length, and femoral offset and postoperatively provided a check on the navigated surgery. Compared to previous studies, the predictive results were better than 2D planning on conventional radiography and equal to 3D planning on CT images, with lower radiation dose, and in the weightbearing position.

Download Full-text

Assessment of an Orthopaedic Templating Software Package for Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty

The Journal of Hip Surgery ◽

10.1055/s-0040-1716575 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 4 (04) ◽

pp. 155-157

Author(s):

Michael Newman ◽

David Hartwright

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Acetabular Cup ◽

Total Hip ◽

Pelvic Radiograph ◽

Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Femoral Stems ◽

Hip Arthroplasties ◽

Acetabular Components ◽

Insight Into

AbstractThe aim of this study was to assess a large, single-surgeon dataset of uncemented total hip arthroplasties that had been templated using software. This assessment compared preoperative templated predictions with what was implanted with regard to (1) femoral prosthesis size and (2) acetabular cup size. The operation notes for two types of uncemented total hip arthroplasty performed by a single surgeon between January 9, 2008, and March 21, 2019, were assessed. The data were refined so that only those that were fully templated on a correctly calibrated pelvic radiograph were included. This provided a total of 153 cases. The predicted software template was compared with actual implanted component sizes. With regard to the femoral stems, the templating software was exactly correct in 45.75% of cases and was accurate to within one size in 87.59% of cases. With regard to the acetabular component, the templating software was exactly correct in 52.94% of cases and was accurate to within one size (2 mm) in 86.94% of cases. Templating software offers an accurate prediction of the size of uncemented femoral and acetabular components. In addition, the benefits of templating include cognitive rehearsal, insight into potentially challenging aspects of surgery, and highlighting intraoperative issues where there is a large intraoperative deviation from what is templated. This study demonstrates the congruence and reproducibility of templating software when compared with other smaller studies performed in the literature.

Download Full-text