scholarly journals Clinical Utility of Three-Dimensional Facial Computed Tomography in the Treatment of Nasal Bone Fractures: A New Modality Involving an Air-Bone View with a Volume Rendering Technique

2011 ◽  
Vol 65 (S2) ◽  
pp. 210-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sun Wha Song ◽  
Beom Cho Jun ◽  
Soo Ryang Chae ◽  
Byung Guk Kim
2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-88
Author(s):  
Cheol-Young Choi ◽  
Hyuk-Jin Jang ◽  
Chong-Ae Kim ◽  
Won-Yong Lee ◽  
Won-Hung Jung

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 131-136
Author(s):  
V Natraj Prasad ◽  
Ashish Khanal

Background & Objectives: The maxillofacial region, a complex anatomical structure, can be evaluated by conventional (plain) films, Tomography, Multidetector Computed Tomography, Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography, Orthopantomogram and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The study was conducted with objective of describing various forms of maxillofacial injuries, imaging features of different types of maxillofacial fractures and the advantage of using Three- Dimensional Computed Tomography reconstructed image. Materials & Methods: A hospital based cross-sectional study was conducted among 50 patients during April 2014 to September 2016 using Toshiba Aquilion Prime 160 slice Multi Detector Computed Tomography scanner.Results: The maxillofacial fractures were significantly higher in male population (88%) than female population (12 %). Road traffic accidents were the most common cause of injury others being physical assault and fall from height. It was most common in 31-40 years (26%) and 21-30 (24%) years age group. Maxillary sinus was the commonest fracture (36%) followed by nasal bone and zygomatic bone (30%), mandible and orbital bones (28%). Soft tissue swelling was the commonest associated finding. Three dimensional images (3 D) compared to the axial scans missed some fractures. However, the extension of the complex fracture lines and degree of displacement were more accurately assessed. Complex fractures found were Le fort (6%) and naso-orbito-ethmoid (4%) fractures.Conclusion: The proper evaluation of complex anatomy of the facial bones requires Multidetector Computed Tomography which offers excellent spatial resolution enabling multiplanar reformations and three dimensional reconstructions for enhanced diagnostic accuracy and surgical planning.


2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ömer Etlik ◽  
Osman Temizöz ◽  
Ali Doğan ◽  
Mustafa Kayan ◽  
Halil Arslan ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 265 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung Ho Lee ◽  
Tae Yong Yang ◽  
Gil Soo Han ◽  
Young Hyo Kim ◽  
Tae Young Jang

1990 ◽  
pp. 379-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoping Hu ◽  
Kim K. Tan ◽  
David N. Levin ◽  
Charles A. Pelizzari ◽  
George T. Y. Chen

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (02) ◽  
pp. 225-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheerin Shah ◽  
Sanjeev K. Uppal ◽  
Rajinder K. Mittal ◽  
Ramneesh Garg ◽  
Kavita Saggar

ABSTRACTIntroduction: Because of its functional and cosmetic importance, facial injuries, especially bony fractures are clinically very significant. Missed and maltreated fractures might result in malocclusion and disfigurement of the face, thus making accurate diagnosis of the fracture very essential. In earlier times, conventional radiography along with clinical examination played a major role in diagnosis of maxillofacial fractures. However, it was noted that the overlapping nature of bones and the inability to visualise soft tissue swelling and fracture displacement, especially in face, makes radiography less reliable and useful. Computed tomography (CT), also called as X-ray computed radiography, has helped in solving this problem. This clinical study is to compare three-dimensional (3D) CT reconstruction with conventional radiography in evaluating the maxillofacial fractures preoperatively and effecting the surgical management, accordingly. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients, with suspected maxillofacial fractures on clinical examination, were subjected to conventional radiography and CT face with 3D reconstruction. The number and site of fractures in zygoma, maxilla, mandible and nose, detected by both the methods, were enumerated and compared. The final bearing of these additional fractures, on the management protocol, was analysed. Results: CT proved superior to conventional radiography in diagnosing additional number of fractures in zygoma, maxilla, mandible (subcondylar) and nasal bone. Coronal and axial images were found to be significantly more diagnostic in fracture sites such as zygomaticomaxillary complex, orbital floor, arch, lateral maxillary wall and anterior maxillary wall. Conclusion: 3D images gave an inside out picture of the actual sites of fractures. It acted as mind’s eye for pre-operative planning and intra-operative execution of surgery. Better surgical treatment could be given to 33% of the cases because of better diagnostic ability of CT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document