Amounts Spent on Engagement Rings Reflect Aspects of Male and Female Mate Quality

Human Nature ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee Cronk ◽  
Bria Dunham
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas G. Aubier ◽  
Hanna Kokko ◽  
Mathieu Joron

Abstract Sexual interactions play an important role in the evolution of reproductive isolation, with important consequences for speciation. Theoretical studies have focused on the evolution of mate preferences in each sex separately. However, mounting empirical evidence suggests that premating isolation often involves mutual mate choice. Here, using a population genetic model, we investigate how female and male mate choice coevolve under a phenotype matching rule and how this affects reproductive isolation. We show that the evolution of female preferences increases the mating success of males with reciprocal preferences, favouring mutual mate choice. However, the evolution of male preferences weakens indirect selection on female preferences and, with weak genetic drift, the coevolution of female and male mate choice leads to periodic episodes of random mating with increased hybridization (deterministic ‘preference cycling’ triggered by stochasticity). Thus, counterintuitively, the process of establishing premating isolation proves rather fragile if both male and female mate choice contribute to assortative mating.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas G. Aubier ◽  
Hanna Kokko ◽  
Mathieu Joron

AbstractSexual interactions play an important role in the evolution of reproductive isolation, with important consequences for speciation. Theoretical studies have focused on the evolution of mate preferences in each sex separately. However, mounting empirical evidence suggests that premating isolation often involves mutual mate choice. Here, using a population genetic model, we investigate how female and male mate choice coevolve under a phenotype matching rule and how this affects reproductive isolation. We show that the evolution of female preferences increases the mating success of males with reciprocal preferences, favouring mutual mate choice. However, the evolution of male preferences weakens indirect selection on female preferences and, with weak genetic drift, the coevolution of female and male mate choice leads to periodic episodes of random mating with increased hybridization (deterministic ‘preference cycling’ triggered by stochasticity). Thus, counterintuitively, the process of establishing premating isolation proves rather fragile if both male and female mate choice contribute to assortative mating.


Author(s):  
Ingo Schlupp

In this short chapter I want to discuss the role of sex ratios in choosiness. So far, we have mostly reviewed intrinsic reasons for male choosiness to be expressed such as male investment and female quality; however, sex ratios may also be important drivers of choosiness. Sex ratios are important in population biology and influence the evolution and structure of mating systems. Most important for the purpose of this book is that they can change quickly in time and space. Male and female choice are sensitive to such changes and can lead to situations where females are choosy when they are rare in a population but change to courtship and competition when males are rare. There are not many examples of this process, but there are likely some that have been overlooked. Interestingly, the majority of data on preferences are collected using binary choice tests, which almost always represent a 2:1 sex ratio. Furthermore, sex ratios do not take into account differences in mate quality, as all adult individuals are classified as either male or female without making any further distinction.


Ethology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 113 (9) ◽  
pp. 901-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona R. Cross ◽  
Robert R. Jackson ◽  
Simon D. Pollard

Ethology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 123 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann E. Pratt ◽  
Donald J. Shure ◽  
Denson K. McLain ◽  
Katrina Banderet

Author(s):  
Glauco Machado ◽  
Gustavo S. Requena ◽  
Carlos Toscano-Gadea ◽  
Estefanía Stanley ◽  
Rogelio Macías-Ordóñez

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Ian Horn ◽  
Gary Ritchison

Many factors, including nestling age, brood size, and mate quality, can influence the provisioning behaviour of adult birds. Mate quality may affect provisioning behaviour because high-quality individuals may be ‘good parents’ and provision at higher rates. Alternatively, individuals paired to high-quality mates may provision at higher rates because the benefits provided by such mates ( e.g. good genes) increase the likelihood of reproductive success. We examined variation in the plumage colour of male and female Eastern Phoebes ( Sayornis phoebe) and the possible relationship between such variation and provisioning behaviour. During the 2006–2007 breeding seasons, we captured, banded, and measured adult Eastern Phoebes and collected belly feathers for spectral analyses. We also videotaped nests to quantify provisioning behaviour. Male Eastern Phoebes were larger than females, but the plumage (belly feathers) of males and females did not differ in brightness, hue, and carotenoid chroma (all P ≥ 0.37). Females provisioned nestlings at higher rates than males ( P = 0.009), but we found no significant relationship between provisioning rates of males and females and plumage colour. However, relationships between female provisioning rates and the brightness and carotenoid chroma of their mates’ belly feathers approached significance ( P ≤ 0.08). The larger size of male Eastern Phoebes suggests there is male–male competition for access to resources ( e.g. nest sites and mates), with larger size conferring a selective advantage. However, the absence of intersexual differences in plumage colour suggests limited sexual selection driven by female choice for extra-pair partners. Differences in provisioning rates of males and females may be due to male uncertainty of paternity status or to intersexual differences in foraging behaviour. The relationship between female provisioning rates and male plumage quality suggests that females may invest more in reproduction if male Eastern Phoebes with brighter, carotenoid-rich belly plumage are better able to provide quality nest sites and territories or, perhaps, high-quality genes that can potentially enhance female fitness (differential-allocation hypothesis).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document