scholarly journals Metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 361-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Y. Ponzio ◽  
Matthew S. Austin
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Metaphyseal Bone

Two stage revision knee arthroplasty for infection with massive bone loss. A technique to achieve spacer stability

The Knee ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.S.J. Nickinson ◽  
T.N. Board ◽  
A.K. Gambhir ◽  
M.L. Porter ◽  
P.R. Kay
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Revision Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Massive Bone Loss ◽  
Massive Bone

Management of the bone loss by metaphyseal sleeves in primary and revision knee arthroplasty: clinical experience and outcome after forty three cases

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (11) ◽  
pp. 2315-2320
Author(s):  
Usman Nazir Gill ◽  
Nasir Ahmed ◽  
Syed Shahid Noor ◽  
Iftikhar Ahmed Memon ◽  
Zulfiqar Ali Memon
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Clinical Experience ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Knee Arthroplasty

scholarly journals The Use of Structural Allograft in Primary and Revision Knee Arthroplasty with Bone Loss

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raul A. Kuchinad ◽  
Shawn Garbedian ◽  
Benedict A. Rogers ◽  
David Backstein ◽  
Oleg Safir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Bone Stock ◽  
Challenging Problem ◽  
Revision Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Simple Addition ◽  
Tumour Prosthesis ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Segmental Bone

Bone loss around the knee in the setting of total knee arthroplasty remains a difficult and challenging problem for orthopaedic surgeons. There are a number of options for dealing with smaller and contained bone loss; however, massive segmental bone loss has fewer options. Small, contained defects can be treated with cement, morselized autograft/allograft or metal augments. Segmental bone loss cannot be dealt with through simple addition of cement, morselized autograft/allograft, or metal augments. For younger or higher demand patients, the use of allograft is a good option as it provides a durable construct with high rates of union while restoring bone stock for future revisions. Older patients, or those who are low demand, may be better candidates for a tumour prosthesis, which provides immediate ability to weight bear and mobilize.

Revision Knee Arthroplasty for Bone Loss: Choosing the Right Degree of Constraint

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Shen ◽  
Paul M. Lichstein ◽  
Matthew S. Austin ◽  
Peter F. Sharkey ◽  
Javad Parvizi
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
The Right
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document