Bayesian rainfall frequency analysis with extreme value using the informative prior distribution

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 1502-1514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun-Sung Chung ◽  
Sang Ug Kim
MAUSAM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 451-462
Author(s):  
DHRUBA JYOTI BORA ◽  
MUNINDRA BORAH ◽  
ABHIJIT BHUYAN

Rainfall data of the northeast region of India has been considered for selecting best fit model for rainfall frequency analysis. The methods of L-moment has been employed for estimation of parameters five probability distributions, namely Generalized extreme value (GEV), Generalized Logistic(GLO), Pearson type 3 (PE3), 3 parameter Log normal (LN3) and Generalized Pareto (GPA) distributions. The methods of LH-moment of four orders (L1 L2, L3 & L4-moments) have also been used for estimating the parameters of three probability distributions namely Generalized extreme value (GEV), Generalized Logistic (GLO) and Generalized Pareto (GPA) distributions. PE3 distribution has been selected as the best fitting distribution using L-moment, GPA distribution using L1-moment and GLO distribution using L2, L3 & L4-moments. Relative root mean square error (RRMSE) and RBIAS are employed to compare between the results found from L-moment and LH-moment analysis. It is found that GPA distribution designated by L1-moment method is the most suitable and the best fitting distribution for rainfall frequency analysis of the northeast India. Also the L1-moment method is significantly more efficient than L-moment and other orders of LH-moment for rainfall frequency analysis of the northeast India.


2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 437-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher M. Trefry ◽  
David W. Watkins ◽  
Dennis Johnson

1994 ◽  
Vol 44 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 123-126
Author(s):  
E. S. Jebvanand ◽  
N. Unnikrishnan Nair

In this note we prove that the exponential distribution is characterized by the property [Formula: see text] where Y is a future observation and x1, x2,…, x n are identical and independently distributed observations from a continuous population with density f( x; a), where a is assumed to have a non-informative prior distribution


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 223-143
Author(s):  
Víctor H. Salinas Torres ◽  
Cristián A. Vásquez ◽  
José S. Romeo

 This work presents a Bayesian approach for estimating the limiting availability of an one-unit repairable system. A Bayesian analysis is developed considering an informative prior and a less informative prior distribution, respectively. Simulations are presented to study the performance of the Bayesian solutions. The maximum likelihood method is also revisited. Finally, a case study is considered, the Bayesian methodology is applied to estimate the limiting availability of a palletizer, which is used in the packaging of glass bottles. Extensions to a coherent system are also discussed.


Proceedings ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikoletta Stamatatou ◽  
Lampros Vasiliades ◽  
Athanasios Loukas

The objective of this study is to compare univariate and joint bivariate return periods of extreme precipitation that all rely on different probability concepts in selected meteorological stations in Cyprus. Pairs of maximum rainfall depths with corresponding durations are estimated and compared using annual maximum series (AMS) for the complete period of the analysis and 30-year subsets for selected data periods. Marginal distributions of extreme precipitation are examined and used for the estimation of typical design periods. The dependence between extreme rainfall and duration is then assessed by an exploratory data analysis using K-plots and Chi-plots and the consistency of their relationship is quantified by Kendall’s correlation coefficient. Copulas from Archimedean, Elliptical, and Extreme Value families are fitted using a pseudo-likelihood estimation method, evaluated according to the corrected Akaike Information Criterion and verified using both graphical approaches and a goodness-of-fit test based on the Cramér-von Mises statistic. The selected copula functions and the corresponding conditional and joint return periods are calculated and the results are compared with the marginal univariate estimations of each variable. Results highlight the effect of sample size on univariate and bivariate rainfall frequency analysis for hydraulic engineering design practices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document