Simplified Constant Volume Simple Shear Tests on Clay

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 2834-2842
Author(s):  
Siaw Yin Thian ◽  
Choon Yong Lee
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 2507-2527 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Lashkari ◽  
S. R. Falsafizadeh ◽  
P. T. Shourijeh ◽  
M. J. Alipour

Géotechnique ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Dyvik ◽  
T. Berre ◽  
S. Lacasse ◽  
B. Raadim

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 20190471
Author(s):  
M. Konstadinou ◽  
A. Bezuijen ◽  
G. Greeuw ◽  
C. Zwanenburg ◽  
H. M. Van Essen ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 85 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelin Chen ◽  
Stelios Kyriakides ◽  
Martin Scales

The shear stress–strain response of an aluminum alloy is measured to a shear strain of the order of one using a pure torsion experiment on a thin-walled tube. The material exhibits plastic anisotropy that is established through a separate set of biaxial experiments on the same tube stock. The results are used to calibrate Hill's quadratic anisotropic yield function. It is shown that because in simple shear the material axes rotate during deformation, this anisotropy progressively reduces the material tangent modulus. A parametric study demonstrates that the stress–strain response extracted from a simple shear test can be influenced significantly by the anisotropy parameters. It is thus concluded that the material axes rotation inherent to simple shear tests must be included in the analysis of such experiments when the material exhibits anisotropy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document