scholarly journals Coping with COVID-19 in Sub-Saharan Africa: What Might the Future Hold?

Author(s):  
Franck J. D. Mennechet ◽  
Guy R. Takoudjou Dzomo
The Lancet ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 390 (10114) ◽  
pp. 2803-2859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Akua Agyepong ◽  
Nelson Sewankambo ◽  
Agnes Binagwaho ◽  
Awa Marie Coll-Seck ◽  
Tumani Corrah ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
pp. 19-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wondwosen Tamrat ◽  
Daniel Levy

Ethiopia’s private higher education (PHE) sector is the largest or second largest in sub-Saharan Africa, however a mix of enabling and restrictive policies have let PHE play a limited role in key respects. This article surveys the current landscape and asks important questions regarding the future of PHE.


Author(s):  
Paul A. Adedeji ◽  
Stephen Akinlabi ◽  
Nkosinathi Madushele ◽  
Obafemi Olatunji

Nature ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 572 (7768) ◽  
pp. 185-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard W. Healy

BMJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. l6540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa Ryckman ◽  
Margaret Robinson ◽  
Courtney Pedersen ◽  
Jay Bhattacharya ◽  
Eran Bendavid

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of the US government’s Feed the Future initiative on nutrition outcomes in children younger than 5 years in sub-Saharan Africa.DesignDifference-in-differences quasi-experimental approach.SettingHouseholds in 33 low and lower middle income countries in sub-Saharan Africa.Population883 309 children aged less than 5 years with weight, height, and age recorded in 118 surveys conducted in 33 countries between 2000 and 2017: 388 052 children were from Feed the Future countries and 495 257 were from non-Feed the Future countries.Main outcome measuresA difference-in-differences approach was used to compare outcomes among children in intervention countries after implementation of the initiative with children before its introduction and children in non-intervention countries, controlling for relevant covariates, time invariant national differences, and time trends. The primary outcome was stunting (height for age >2 standard deviations below a reference median), a key indicator of undernutrition in children. Secondary outcomes were wasting (low weight for height) and underweight (low weight for age).ResultsAcross all years and countries, 38.3% of children in the study sample were stunted, 8.9% showed wasting, and 21.3% were underweight. In the first six years of Feed the Future’s implementation, children in 12 countries with the initiative exhibited a 3.9 percentage point (95% confidence interval 2.4 to 5.5) greater decline in stunting, a 1.1 percentage point (0.1 to 2.1) greater decline in wasting, and a 2.8 percentage point (1.6 to 4.0) greater decline in underweight levels compared with children in 21 countries without the initiative and compared with trends in undernutrition before Feed the Future was launched. These decreases translate to around two million fewer stunted and underweight children aged less than 5 years and around a half million fewer children with wasting. For context, about 22 million children were stunted, 11 million children were underweight, and four million children were wasted in the Feed the Future countries at baseline.ConclusionsFeed the Future’s activities were closely linked to notable improvements in stunting and underweight levels and moderate improvements in wasting in children younger than 5 years. These findings highlight the effectiveness of this large, country tailored initiative focused on agriculture and food security and have important implications for the future of this and other nutrition interventions worldwide.


2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Kakaire ◽  
Walter Schlech ◽  
Alex Coutinho ◽  
Richard Brough ◽  
Rosalind Parkes-Ratanshi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document