SummaryThe aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic abilities of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) compared with those of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients. Patients, methods: Pre- operative 18F-FDG PET/non-contrast CT, ultrasonography and MRI were performed in 215 women with breast cancer. Axillary lymph node dissection was performed in all patients and the diagnostic performance of each modality was evaluated using histopathologic assessments as the reference standard. ROC curves were compared to evaluate the diagnostic ability of several imaging modalities (i. e., ultrasonography, MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT). Results: In total, 132 patients (61.4%) had axillary lymph node metastasis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis were 72.3%, 77.3%, 66.7%, 81.6%, 75.3% for ultrasonography, 67.5%, 78.0%, 65.9%, 79.2%, 74.0% for MRI, and 62.7%, 88.6%, 77.6%, 79.1%, 78.6% for 18F-FDG PET/CT, respectively. There was no significant difference in diagnostic ability among the imaging modalities (i.e., ultrasonography, MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT). The diagnostic ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT was significantly improved by combination with MRI (p = 0.0002) or ultrasonography (p < 0.0001). The combination of 18F-FDG PET/CT with ultrasonography had a similar diagnostic ability to that of all three modalities combined (18F-FDG PET/CT+ultraso- nography+MRI, p = 0.05). Conclusion: The diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT for detection of axillary node metastasis was not significantly different from that of ultrasonography or MRI in breast cancer patients. Combining 18F-FDG PET/CT with ultrasonography or MRI could improve the diagnostic performance compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT alone.
Diagnostic performance and image interpretation of 18F-FDG PET/CT in aortic graft infection: Two sides of the same coin