scholarly journals Magnetic resonance arthrography of the hip: technique and spectrum of findings in younger patients

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sébastien Aubry ◽  
Danny Bélanger ◽  
Caroline Giguère ◽  
Martin Lavigne
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Arthrography ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Arthrography Of The Hip

Does gadolinium improve magnetic resonance arthrography of the hip beyond fluid distension alone?

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (9) ◽  
pp. 713.e1-713.e9
Author(s):  
C.A. Tiegs-Heiden ◽  
M.C. Adkins ◽  
R.E. Carter ◽  
J.R. Geske ◽  
G.A. McKenzie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Arthrography ◽  
Arthrography Of The Hip

Magnetic resonance arthrography of the hip: prevalence of diagnoses not suspected by the referring physician and correlation with clinical examination and pain score

2015 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 595-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maor Neiman ◽  
Osnat Halshtok Neiman ◽  
Dvora Aharoni ◽  
Boaz Liberman ◽  
Eliyahu Adar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Arthrography ◽  
Arthrography Of The Hip

scholarly journals Fosbury flop tear of the rotator cuff: diagnostic assessment with magnetic resonance arthrography

2017 ◽  
Vol 90 (1077) ◽  
pp. 20170146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank C Kolo ◽  
Adrien J Schwitzguébel ◽  
Abed Kourhani ◽  
Patrick J Denard ◽  
Caecilia Charbonnier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Diagnostic Assessment ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Arthrography

Magnetic Resonance Arthrography Findings in Rugby Players Undergoing Shoulder Stabilization for Glenohumeral Instability

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. e465
Author(s):  
Martin S. Davey ◽  
Eoghan T. Hurley ◽  
Daire J. Hurley ◽  
Leo Pauzenberger ◽  
Hannan Mullett
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Arthrography ◽  
Glenohumeral Instability ◽  
Shoulder Stabilization ◽  
Rugby Players

scholarly journals Magnetic resonance arthrography of the shoulder: a painful procedure?

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo César Xavier do Nascimento ◽  
André Maltez Amaral ◽  
João Ricardo Maltez de Almeida
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Arthrography ◽  
Matched Pairs ◽  
Painful Procedure ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Modified Technique ◽  
Simplified Approach ◽  
Visual Analog Scales ◽  
Categorical Scale

Abstract Objective: To compare the pain expected to that effectively caused by magnetic resonance arthrography of the shoulder and, secondarily, to describe a simplified approach to the technique for articular access. Materials and Methods: We prospectively evaluated 40 participants who used a visual analog scale and a simplified categorical scale to indicate the level of pain expected and that experienced after the procedure, comparing the two with the Wilcoxon matched-pairs test. We also determined gender-related differences in pain conditions using the Mann-Whitney U test. In addition, we described a modified technique involving radiographic localization and the use of standard puncture needles for articular access. Results: Analysis of the visual analog scales showed that the pain experienced was less than had been expected, with median scores of 1.75 and 3.75, respectively (p < 0.001). The level of pain expected was higher among women than among men, with median scores of 8.0 and 3.0, respectively (p = 0.014), as was the level of pain experienced, with median scores of 3.0 and 1.5, respectively (p = 0.139). The overall categorical evaluation corroborated that difference (p = 0.03). Articular access with the modified technique was successful in all patients. Conclusion: Magnetic resonance arthrography of the shoulder is less painful than patients expect. In addition, digital radiographic guidance combined with the use of standard puncture needles appears to improve the efficiency of the method.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document