Magnetic Resonance Arthrography Findings in Rugby Players Undergoing Shoulder Stabilization for Glenohumeral Instability

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. e465
Author(s):  
Martin S. Davey ◽  
Eoghan T. Hurley ◽  
Daire J. Hurley ◽  
Leo Pauzenberger ◽  
Hannan Mullett
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Arthrography ◽  
Glenohumeral Instability ◽  
Shoulder Stabilization ◽  
Rugby Players

Magnetic Resonance Arthrography in the evaluation of Anterior Glenohumeral Instability

1998 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 1240
Author(s):  
Jin Sub Kim ◽  
Yong Wook Park ◽  
Jung Han Yoo ◽  
Yung Khee Chung ◽  
Sung Han Ha
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Arthrography ◽  
Glenohumeral Instability ◽  
Anterior Glenohumeral Instability

Imaging Techniques for the Evaluation of Glenohumeral Instability

2000 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 414-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy G. Sanders ◽  
William B. Morrison ◽  
Mark D. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Conventional Radiography ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Arthrography ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Glenohumeral Instability ◽  
The Past

The ability to image lesions associated with glenohumeral instability has evolved significantly over the past 2 decades. In the past, several imaging techniques ranging from conventional radiography to computerized axial arthrography and, most recently, to magnetic resonance imaging have been used to depict various labral abnormalities. In most instances, conventional radiography remains the initial imaging study for evaluating the patient with persistent shoulder pain and instability. Recently, however, magnetic resonance arthrography has been firmly established as the imaging modality of choice for demonstrating specific soft tissue abnormalities associated with glenohumeral instability. This article will review the role of various imaging modalities including conventional radiography, conventional arthrography, computerized axial arthrography, magnetic resonance imaging, and magnetic resonance arthrography. Emphasis will be placed on the role of magnetic resonance arthrography as it pertains to the lesions associated with glenohumeral instability. A thorough discussion of the appearance of normal anatomic structures, anatomic variations that mimic abnormality, and the various lesions associated with glenohumeral instability will be provided.

Saline magnetic resonance arthrography in the evaluation of glenohumeral instability

1993 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 550-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip F.J. Tirman ◽  
Anthony E. Stauffer ◽  
John V. Crues ◽  
Robert M. Turner ◽  
Wesley M. Nottage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Arthrography ◽  
Glenohumeral Instability

Recurrence and Revision Rates With Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Compared With the Latarjet Procedure in Competitive Rugby Players With Glenohumeral Instability and a Glenoid Bone Loss <20%

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 866-872
Author(s):  
Luciano A. Rossi ◽  
Ignacio Tanoira ◽  
Tomás Gorodischer ◽  
Ignacio Pasqualini ◽  
Maximiliano Ranalletta
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Glenoid Bone Loss ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Latarjet Procedure ◽  
Glenohumeral Instability ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Rugby Players

Background: There is a lack of evidence in the literature comparing outcomes between the arthroscopic Bankart repair and the Latarjet procedure in competitive rugby players with glenohumeral instability and a glenoid bone loss <20%. Purpose: To compare return to sport, functional outcomes, and complications between the arthroscopic Bankart repair and the Latarjet procedure in competitive rugby players with glenohumeral instability and a glenoid bone loss <20%. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Between June 2010 and February 2018, 130 competitive rugby players with anterior shoulder instability were operated on in our institution. The first 80 patients were operated on with the arthroscopic Bankart procedure and the other 50 with the open Latarjet procedure. Return to sport, range of motion (ROM), the Rowe score, and the Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS) were used to assess functional outcomes. Recurrences, reoperations, and complications were also evaluated. Results: In the total population, the mean follow-up was 40 months (range, 24-90 months) and the mean age was 24.2 years (range, 16-33 years). Ninety-two percent of patients were able to return to rugby, 88% at their preinjury level of play. Eighty-nine percent of patients in the Bankart group and 87% in the Latarjet group returned to compete at the same level ( P = .788). No significant difference in shoulder ROM was found between preoperative and postoperative results. The Rowe and ASOSS scores showed statistical improvement after operation ( P < .01). No significant difference in functional scores was found between the groups The Rowe score in the Bankart group increased from a preoperative mean (± SD) of 41 ± 13 points to 89.7 points postoperatively, and in the Latarjet group, from a preoperative mean of 42.5 ± 14 points to 88.4 points postoperatively ( P = .95). The ASOSS score in the Bankart group increased from a preoperative mean of 53.3 ± 3 points to 93.3 ± 6 points postoperatively, and in the Latarjet group, from a preoperative mean of 53.1 ± 3 points to 93.7 ± 4 points postoperatively ( P = .95). There were 18 recurrences (14%). The rate of recurrence was 20% in the Bankart group and 4% in the Latarjet group ( P = .01). There were 15 reoperations (12%). The rate of reoperation was 16% in the Bankart group and 4% in the Latarjet group ( P = .03). There were 6 complications (5%). The rate of complications was 4% in the Bankart group and 6% in the Latarjet group ( P = .55). The proportion of postoperative osteoarthritis was 10% in the Bankart group (8/80 patients) and 12% (6/50 patients) in the Latarjet group ( P = .55). Conclusion: In competitive rugby players with glenohumeral instability and a glenoid bone loss <20%, both the arthroscopic Bankart repair and the Latarjet procedure produced excellent functional outcomes, with most athletes returning to sport at the same level they had before the injury. However, the Bankart procedure was associated with a significantly higher rate of recurrence (20% vs 4%) and reoperation (16% vs 4%) than the Latarjet procedure.

scholarly journals Fosbury flop tear of the rotator cuff: diagnostic assessment with magnetic resonance arthrography

2017 ◽  
Vol 90 (1077) ◽  
pp. 20170146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank C Kolo ◽  
Adrien J Schwitzguébel ◽  
Abed Kourhani ◽  
Patrick J Denard ◽  
Caecilia Charbonnier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Diagnostic Assessment ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Arthrography

scholarly journals Magnetic resonance arthrography of the hip: technique and spectrum of findings in younger patients

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sébastien Aubry ◽  
Danny Bélanger ◽  
Caroline Giguère ◽  
Martin Lavigne
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Arthrography ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Arthrography Of The Hip

scholarly journals Magnetic resonance arthrography of the shoulder: a painful procedure?

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo César Xavier do Nascimento ◽  
André Maltez Amaral ◽  
João Ricardo Maltez de Almeida
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Arthrography ◽  
Matched Pairs ◽  
Painful Procedure ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Modified Technique ◽  
Simplified Approach ◽  
Visual Analog Scales ◽  
Categorical Scale

Abstract Objective: To compare the pain expected to that effectively caused by magnetic resonance arthrography of the shoulder and, secondarily, to describe a simplified approach to the technique for articular access. Materials and Methods: We prospectively evaluated 40 participants who used a visual analog scale and a simplified categorical scale to indicate the level of pain expected and that experienced after the procedure, comparing the two with the Wilcoxon matched-pairs test. We also determined gender-related differences in pain conditions using the Mann-Whitney U test. In addition, we described a modified technique involving radiographic localization and the use of standard puncture needles for articular access. Results: Analysis of the visual analog scales showed that the pain experienced was less than had been expected, with median scores of 1.75 and 3.75, respectively (p < 0.001). The level of pain expected was higher among women than among men, with median scores of 8.0 and 3.0, respectively (p = 0.014), as was the level of pain experienced, with median scores of 3.0 and 1.5, respectively (p = 0.139). The overall categorical evaluation corroborated that difference (p = 0.03). Articular access with the modified technique was successful in all patients. Conclusion: Magnetic resonance arthrography of the shoulder is less painful than patients expect. In addition, digital radiographic guidance combined with the use of standard puncture needles appears to improve the efficiency of the method.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document