scholarly journals Full Open Population Capture–Recapture Models With Individual Covariates

Author(s):  
Matthew R. Schofield ◽  
Richard J. Barker
Ecosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher B. Satter ◽  
Ben C. Augustine ◽  
Bart J. Harmsen ◽  
Rebecca J. Foster ◽  
Marcella J. Kelly

The Condor ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 720-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
William L. Kendall ◽  
James D. Nichols

Abstract The estimation of dispersal and movement is important to evolutionary and population ecologists, as well as to wildlife managers. We review statistical methodology available to estimate movement probabilities. We begin with cases where individual birds can be marked and their movements estimated with the use of multisite capture-recapture methods. Movements can be monitored either directly, using telemetry, or by accounting for detection probability when conventional marks are used. When one or more sites are unobservable, telemetry, band recoveries, incidental observations, a closed- or open-population robust design, or partial determinism in movements can be used to estimate movement. When individuals cannot be marked, presence-absence data can be used to model changes in occupancy over time, providing indirect inferences about movement. Where abundance estimates over time are available for multiple sites, potential coupling of their dynamics can be investigated using linear cross-correlation or nonlinear dynamic tools. Sobre la Estimación de la Dispersión y el Movimiento de las Aves Resumen. La estimación de la dispersión y el movimiento es importante para los ecó logos evolutivos y de poblaciones, así como también para los encargados del manejo de vida silvestre. Revisamos la metodología estadística disponible para estimar probabilidades de movimiento. Empezamos con casos donde aves individuales pueden ser marcadas y sus movimientos estimados con el uso de métodos de captura-repactura para múltiples sitios. Los movimientos pueden ser monitoreados ya sea directamente, usando telemetría o teniendo en cuenta las probabilidades de detección cuando se usan marcas convencionales. Cuando uno o más sitios no pueden ser observados, se puede estimar el movimiento usando telemetría, recuperación de anillos, observaciones circunstanciales, un diseño poblacional robusto cerrado o abierto, o determinismo parcial de los movimientos. Cuando los individuos no pueden ser marcados, se pueden usar datos de presencia-ausencia para modelar los cambios en el tiempo de la ocupación, brindando inferencias indirectas sobre los movimientos. Cuando las estimaciones de abundancia a lo largo del tiempo están disponibles para varios sitios, se puede investigar la interrelación potencial de sus dinámicas usando correlaciones cruzadas lineales o herramientas para dinámica no lineal.


Ecosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyril Milleret ◽  
Pierre Dupont ◽  
Joseph Chipperfield ◽  
Daniel Turek ◽  
Henrik Brøseth ◽  
...  

Biometrics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 1345-1355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Glennie ◽  
David L. Borchers ◽  
Matthew Murchie ◽  
Bart J. Harmsen ◽  
Rebecca J. Foster

Biometrics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 280-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Huggins ◽  
Jakub Stoklosa ◽  
Cameron Roach ◽  
Paul Yip

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 654-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni Matechou ◽  
Shirley Pledger ◽  
Murray Efford ◽  
Byron J.T. Morgan ◽  
David L. Thomson

2020 ◽  
pp. 301-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Félix ◽  
Cristina Castro ◽  
Jeffrey L. Laake

Southeastern Pacific humpback whales (Breeding Stock G) breed along the northwestern coast of South America and farther north up to CostaRica. Photo-identification surveys conducted aboard whalewatching vessels during the migration/breeding season from June to September between1991 and 2006 off the coast of Ecuador (2°S, 81°W) have produced a database of 1,511 individual whales. Comparisons of photographs produced190 between-year re-sightings of 155 individual whales. Closed and open capture-recapture models were used to estimate abundance and survival.The best estimate of abundance in 2006 with the Chapman modified-Petersen was 6,504 (95% CI: 4,270–9,907; CV = 0.21). Abundance estimatesfrom open population models were considerably lower due to heterogeneity in capture probability which produced a ‘transient’ effect. Our bestestimate of true survival was 0.919 (95% CI: 0.850–0.958). Heterogeneity most likely occurred from inter-annual variation in sampling and unknownstructure and variation in the migration timing and corridor. A more extensive collaborative effort including other wintering areas further north aswell as integrating breeding-feeding data will help to reduce heterogeneity and increase precision in abundance and survival estimates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document