scholarly journals Abundance and survival estimates of the southeastern Pacific humpback whale stock from 1991–2006 photo-identification surveys in Ecuador

2020 ◽  
pp. 301-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Félix ◽  
Cristina Castro ◽  
Jeffrey L. Laake
Keyword(s):  
Annual Variation ◽  
Humpback Whales ◽  
Collaborative Effort ◽  
Transient Effect ◽  
Photo Identification ◽  
Migration Timing ◽  
Open Population ◽  
Southeastern Pacific ◽  
Capture Recapture ◽  
Wintering Areas

Southeastern Pacific humpback whales (Breeding Stock G) breed along the northwestern coast of South America and farther north up to CostaRica. Photo-identification surveys conducted aboard whalewatching vessels during the migration/breeding season from June to September between1991 and 2006 off the coast of Ecuador (2°S, 81°W) have produced a database of 1,511 individual whales. Comparisons of photographs produced190 between-year re-sightings of 155 individual whales. Closed and open capture-recapture models were used to estimate abundance and survival.The best estimate of abundance in 2006 with the Chapman modified-Petersen was 6,504 (95% CI: 4,270–9,907; CV = 0.21). Abundance estimatesfrom open population models were considerably lower due to heterogeneity in capture probability which produced a ‘transient’ effect. Our bestestimate of true survival was 0.919 (95% CI: 0.850–0.958). Heterogeneity most likely occurred from inter-annual variation in sampling and unknownstructure and variation in the migration timing and corridor. A more extensive collaborative effort including other wintering areas further north aswell as integrating breeding-feeding data will help to reduce heterogeneity and increase precision in abundance and survival estimates.

A longitudinal study of humpback whales in Irish waters

2015 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 877-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Conor Ryan ◽  
Pádraig Whooley ◽  
Simon D. Berrow ◽  
Colin Barnes ◽  
Nick Massett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
North Atlantic ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Humpback Whales ◽  
Migratory Species ◽  
The Public ◽  
Photo Identification ◽  
The North ◽  
Breeding Grounds ◽  
Eastern North Atlantic

Knowledge on the ecology of humpback whales in the eastern North Atlantic is lacking by comparison with most other ocean basins. Humpback whales were historically over-exploited in the region and are still found in low relative abundances. This, coupled with their large range makes them difficult to study. With the aim of informing more effective conservation measures in Ireland, the Irish Whale and Dolphin Group began recording sightings and images suitable for photo-identification of humpback whales from Irish waters in 1999. Validated records submitted by members of the public and data from dedicated surveys were analysed to form a longitudinal study of individually recognizable humpback whales. The distribution, relative abundance and seasonality of humpback whale sighting records are presented, revealing discrete important areas for humpback whales in Irish coastal waters. An annual easterly movement of humpback whales along the southern coast of Ireland is documented, mirroring that of their preferred prey: herring and sprat. Photo-identification images were compared with others collected throughout the North Atlantic (N = 8016), resulting in matches of two individuals between Ireland and Iceland, Norway and the Netherlands but no matches to known breeding grounds (Cape Verde and West Indies). This study demonstrates that combining public records with dedicated survey data is an effective approach to studying low-density, threatened migratory species over temporal and spatial scales that are relevant to conservation and management.

scholarly journals Abundance of humpback whales in Oceania using photo-identification and microsatellite genotyping

2012 ◽  
Vol 453 ◽  
pp. 249-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Constantine ◽  
JA Jackson ◽  
D Steel ◽  
CS Baker ◽  
L Brooks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Humpback Whales ◽  
Microsatellite Genotyping ◽  
Photo Identification

Advanced image recognition: a fully automated, high-accuracy photo-identification matching system for humpback whales

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Cheeseman ◽  
Ken Southerland ◽  
Jinmo Park ◽  
Marilia Olio ◽  
Kiirsten Flynn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Recognition ◽  
High Accuracy ◽  
Humpback Whales ◽  
Photo Identification

scholarly journals Sex‐specific population dynamics of ocelots in Belize using open population spatial capture–recapture

Ecosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher B. Satter ◽  
Ben C. Augustine ◽  
Bart J. Harmsen ◽  
Rebecca J. Foster ◽  
Marcella J. Kelly
Keyword(s):  
Population Dynamics ◽  
Specific Population ◽  
Open Population ◽  
Capture Recapture

scholarly journals On the Estimation of Dispersal and Movement of Birds

The Condor ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 720-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
William L. Kendall ◽  
James D. Nichols
Keyword(s):  
Robust Design ◽  
Nonlinear Dynamic ◽  
Detection Probability ◽  
Cross Correlation ◽  
Statistical Methodology ◽  
Open Population ◽  
Abundance Estimates ◽  
Capture Recapture ◽  
Over Time

Abstract The estimation of dispersal and movement is important to evolutionary and population ecologists, as well as to wildlife managers. We review statistical methodology available to estimate movement probabilities. We begin with cases where individual birds can be marked and their movements estimated with the use of multisite capture-recapture methods. Movements can be monitored either directly, using telemetry, or by accounting for detection probability when conventional marks are used. When one or more sites are unobservable, telemetry, band recoveries, incidental observations, a closed- or open-population robust design, or partial determinism in movements can be used to estimate movement. When individuals cannot be marked, presence-absence data can be used to model changes in occupancy over time, providing indirect inferences about movement. Where abundance estimates over time are available for multiple sites, potential coupling of their dynamics can be investigated using linear cross-correlation or nonlinear dynamic tools. Sobre la Estimación de la Dispersión y el Movimiento de las Aves Resumen. La estimación de la dispersión y el movimiento es importante para los ecó logos evolutivos y de poblaciones, así como también para los encargados del manejo de vida silvestre. Revisamos la metodología estadística disponible para estimar probabilidades de movimiento. Empezamos con casos donde aves individuales pueden ser marcadas y sus movimientos estimados con el uso de métodos de captura-repactura para múltiples sitios. Los movimientos pueden ser monitoreados ya sea directamente, usando telemetría o teniendo en cuenta las probabilidades de detección cuando se usan marcas convencionales. Cuando uno o más sitios no pueden ser observados, se puede estimar el movimiento usando telemetría, recuperación de anillos, observaciones circunstanciales, un diseño poblacional robusto cerrado o abierto, o determinismo parcial de los movimientos. Cuando los individuos no pueden ser marcados, se pueden usar datos de presencia-ausencia para modelar los cambios en el tiempo de la ocupación, brindando inferencias indirectas sobre los movimientos. Cuando las estimaciones de abundancia a lo largo del tiempo están disponibles para varios sitios, se puede investigar la interrelación potencial de sus dinámicas usando correlaciones cruzadas lineales o herramientas para dinámica no lineal.

scholarly journals Estimating abundance with interruptions in data collection using open population spatial capture–recapture models

Ecosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyril Milleret ◽  
Pierre Dupont ◽  
Joseph Chipperfield ◽  
Daniel Turek ◽  
Henrik Brøseth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Open Population ◽  
Capture Recapture

scholarly journals Abundance, survival and temporary emigration of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) off Useless Loop in the western gulf of Shark Bay, Western Australia

2012 ◽  
Vol 63 (11) ◽  
pp. 1059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krista Nicholson ◽  
Lars Bejder ◽  
Simon J. Allen ◽  
Michael Krützen ◽  
Kenneth H. Pollock
Keyword(s):  
Western Australia ◽  
Bottlenose Dolphins ◽  
Early Spring ◽  
Anthropogenic Activity ◽  
Apparent Survival ◽  
Photo Identification ◽  
Temporary Emigration ◽  
Shark Bay ◽  
Abundance Estimates ◽  
Capture Recapture

Capture–recapture models were used to provide estimates of abundance, apparent survival and temporary emigration of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) in a 226-km2 study area off Useless Loop in the western gulf of Shark Bay, Western Australia. Photo-identification data were collected during boat-based surveys in Austral autumn to early spring (April–September) from 2007 to 2011. Abundance estimates varied from 115 (s.e. 5.2, 95% CI 105–126) individuals in 2008 to 208 (s.e. 17.3, 95% CI 177–245) individuals in 2010. The variability in abundance estimates is likely to be a reflection of how individuals used the study area, rather than fluctuations in true population size. The best fitting capture–recapture model suggested a random temporary emigration pattern and, when coupled with relatively high temporary emigration rates (0.33 (s.e. 0.07) – 0.66 (s.e. 0.05)) indicated that the study area did not cover the entire ranges of the photo-identified dolphins. Apparent survival rate is a product of true survival and permanent emigration and was estimated annually at 0.95 (s.e. 0.02). Since permanent emigration from the study area is unlikely, true survival was estimated to be close to 0.95. This study provides a robust baseline for future comparisons of dolphin demographics, which may be of importance should climate change or increasing anthropogenic activity affect this population.

scholarly journals Open population maximum likelihood spatial capture‐recapture

Biometrics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 1345-1355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Glennie ◽  
David L. Borchers ◽  
Matthew Murchie ◽  
Bart J. Harmsen ◽  
Rebecca J. Foster
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Open Population ◽  
Capture Recapture ◽  
Population Maximum

Errors in identification using natural markings: rates, sources, and effects on capture–recapture estimates of abundance

2001 ◽  
Vol 58 (9) ◽  
pp. 1861-1870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter T Stevick ◽  
Per J Palsbøll ◽  
Tim D Smith ◽  
Mark V Bravington ◽  
Philip S Hammond
Keyword(s):  
Error Rate ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Parametric Bootstrap ◽  
Humpback Whales ◽  
The North ◽  
Abundance Estimates ◽  
Capture Recapture ◽  
Quality Rating ◽  
Estimation Of Variance

The results of a double-marking experiment using natural markings and microsatellite genetic markers to identify humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) confirm that natural markings are a reliable means of identifying individuals on a large scale. Of 1410 instances of double tagging, there were 414 resightings. No false positive and 14 false negative errors were identified. The rate of error increased with decreasing photographic quality; no errors were observed among photographs of the highest quality rating, whereas an error rate of 0.125 was identified in sightings for which only part of the area used for identification was visible. There was also a weaker relationship between error rate and the distinctiveness of markings, which may result from non-independence in coding for image quality and distinctiveness. A correction is developed for the Petersen two-sample abundance estimator to account for false negative errors in identification, and a parametric bootstrap procedure for estimation of variance is also developed. In application to abundance estimates from the North Atlantic, the correction reduces the bias in estimates made using poorer quality photographs to a negligible level while maintaining comparable precision.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document