Enhanced recovery after surgery in colon and rectal surgery: identification of predictive variables of failure in a monocentric series including 733 patients

Author(s):  
Andrea Vignali ◽  
Ugo Elmore ◽  
Giovanni Guarneri ◽  
Valentino De Ruvo ◽  
Paolo Parise ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (03) ◽  
pp. 166-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Harnsberger ◽  
Justin Maykel ◽  
Karim Alavi

AbstractPostoperative ileus (POI) is a common complication following colon and rectal surgery, with reported incidence ranging from 10 to 30%. It can lead to increased morbidity, cost, and length of stay. Although definitions vary considerably in the literature, in its pathologic form, it can be characterized by a temporary inhibition of gastrointestinal motility after surgical intervention due to nonmechanical causes that prevents sufficient oral intake. Various risk factors for development of POI have been identified including increasing age, American Society of Anesthesiologists scores 3 to 4, open approach, operative difficulty, operative duration more than 3 hours, bowel handling, drop in hematocrit or need for a transfusion, increasing crystalloid administration, and delayed mobilization. While treatment is expectant and supportive, significant investigations into strategies to mitigate development of POI or shorten its duration have been undertaken with mixed results. There is significant evidence to suggest that a minimally invasive approach and multimodal pain regimens reduce the development of POI. The beneficial effect of chewing gum, alvimopan, and enhanced recovery after surgery protocols may decrease development of POI in selected groups of patients who undergo elective colorectal surgery, and shorten time to return of bowel function, but overall, the data remain inconclusive.


2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (12) ◽  

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate short-term outcomes of patients undergoing mini-invasive rectal resection within an ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) protocol. Methods: A prospectively managed database of patients undergoing rectal operations performed at our department between January 2015 and April 2020 was retrospectively analyzed. An ERAS protocol was implemented into clinical practice at our department in April 2016 and mini-invasive rectal procedures in May 2016. The ERAS group consisted of all patients who underwent mini-invasive rectal resections or amputations within the ERAS protocol. The control group consisted of patients who underwent open procedures and received standard perioperative care. The extracted data included basic patient characteristics, surgical data, postoperative recovery parameters, 30-day morbidity, length of postoperative stay and 30-day rehospitalization. Results: A total of 110 patients were included in the study: 67 patients in the ERAS group and 43 in the control group. Within the ERAS group 47 patients underwent robotic procedures and 20 had laparoscopic procedures. Patients in the ERAS group had significantly better clinical and laboratory recovery parameters except for postoperative nausea and vomiting. A significantly lower incidence of paralytic ileus (20.9% vs. 3%) and a shorter length of postoperative stay (13 days vs. 9 days) was found in the ERAS group. The rehospitalization rate and 30-day morbidity were not different between the ERAS and control group. Conclusions: Implementation of the ERAS protocol in combination with mini-invasive approaches leads to better short-term postoperative outcomes after rectal surgery.


2011 ◽  
Vol 54 (7) ◽  
pp. 833-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascal H. E. Teeuwen ◽  
Robert P. Bleichrodt ◽  
Paul J. M. de Jong ◽  
Harry van Goor ◽  
Andre J. A. Bremers

2012 ◽  
Vol 82 (10) ◽  
pp. 697-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celia Keane ◽  
Stephanie Savage ◽  
Kim McFarlane ◽  
Richard Seigne ◽  
Greg Robertson ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 627
Author(s):  
Anuja Mitra ◽  
Donna Hodge ◽  
Angela Wheeler ◽  
Colin Elton ◽  
Gary Atkin ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 229 (4) ◽  
pp. e95-e96
Author(s):  
Mohammed Al-Temimi ◽  
Katerina Wells ◽  
James Jr Fleshman ◽  
Walter Peters

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document