scholarly journals A database and synthesis of euglossine bee assemblages collected at fragrance baits

Apidologie ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 519-530
Author(s):  
Øystein H. Opedal ◽  
Adriana A. Martins ◽  
Emma-Liina Marjakangas
Keyword(s):  
2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme do Carmo Silveira ◽  
Anderson Machado Nascimento ◽  
Silvia Helena Sofia ◽  
Solange Cristina Augusto

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALEJANDRO DEL MAZO CANCINO ◽  
ANNE DAMON
Keyword(s):  

Check List ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Storck-Tonon ◽  
Marilene Vasconcelos Silva ◽  
Elder Ferreira Morato

This study presents a list of euglossine-bee species collected in the Lago do Silêncio region, municipality of Boca do Acre, in the Brazilian state of Amazonas, southwestern Amazonia. Euglossine males were attracted to odoriferous baits on December 3 and 4, 2004. A total of 234 individuals belonging to four genera and 25 species were collected. Despite the small sampling effort, the local euglossine fauna is abundant and rich, when compared to those of other areas in the Brazilian Amazonia where higher sampling efforts were performed. Therefore, further studies in the region can be important for improving our knowledge of the bees in the Amazon region. 


Lankesteriana ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Norris H. Williams ◽  
W. Mark Whitten

<div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>Tribe Maxillarieae account for approximately 10% (&gt;2800 species) of Orchidaceae and are a major com- ponent of the Neotropical epiphytic flora. Pollination systems include 1) male euglossine-bee fragrance rewards in four subtribes, 2) oil reward systems and mimicry in some groups, 3) nectar rewards in a wide range of taxa, and 4) pseudocopulation in some Maxillariinae and some Oncidiinae. </span></p></div></div></div>


Ecology ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 1192-1195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jess K. Zimmerman ◽  
David W. Roubik ◽  
James D. Ackerman
Keyword(s):  

Apidologie ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 675-687
Author(s):  
Fabíola Mendes dos Santos ◽  
Wallace Beiroz ◽  
Yasmine Antonini ◽  
Silvana Martén-Rodríguez ◽  
Mauricio Quesada ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Brandt ◽  
Stefan Dötterl ◽  
Santiago R. Ramírez ◽  
Florian Etl ◽  
Isabel Cristina Machado ◽  
...  

Male euglossine bees exhibit unique adaptations for the acquisition and accumulation of chemical compounds from “perfume flowers” and other sources. During courtship display, male bees expose perfume mixtures, presumably to convey species-specific recognition and/or mate choice signals to females. Because olfaction regulates both signal production (in males) and signal detection (in females) in this communication system, strong selective pressures are expected to act on the olfactory system, which could lead to sensory specialization in favor of an increased sensitivity to specific chemical compounds. The floral scents of euglossine-pollinated plants are hypothesized to have evolved in response to the preexisting sensory biases of their male euglossine bee pollinators. However, this has never been investigated at the peripheral olfactory circuitry of distinct pollinating genera. Here, we present a comparative analysis using electroantennography (EAG) of males across the phylogeny of 29 euglossine bee species, among them Euglossa and Eulaema species. First, we tested whether antennal responses differ among different euglossine genera, subgenera and species. Secondly, we conducted a comparative phylogenetic analysis to investigate the macroevolutionary patterns of antennal responses across the euglossine bee phylogeny. We found that antennal response profiles are very unique on the species level and differ on the subgenus and the genus level. The differences can be explained by chemical compounds typically found in the floral scent bouquets of perfume flowers and specific compounds of species either pollinated by Euglossa (e.g., ipsdienol) or Eulaema bees (e.g., (−)-(E)-carvone epoxide). Also, we detected a phylogenetic signal in mean antennal responses and found that especially at the species level of our simulation the overall antennal responses exhibit greater disparity relative to a null model of pure Brownian-motion across the phylogeny. Altogether, our results suggest that (1) euglossine bee species exhibit species-specific antennal responses that differ among euglossine genera and subgenera, (2) antennal responses diverge early after speciation events, and (3) scent composition of perfume flowers evolved in response to pollinator-mediated selection imposed by preexisting sensory biases in euglossine bees.


Sociobiology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clycie Aparecida da Silva Machado ◽  
Claudineia Pereira Costa ◽  
Tiago Maurício Francoy

Our aim was to evaluate the occurrence of orchid bees in remnants of the Atlantic Forest. We sampled specimens from five regions of Southeast Brazil, covering three different physiognomies of the Atlantic Forest (mixed Araucaria forests with high altitude fields, Atlantic Semi-deciduous Forest and Atlantic Rain Forest). The distances between the sampling sites ranged from 24 to 746 km. Male orchid bees attracted by fragrances were actively sampled monthly during one year using entomological nets and aromatic traps. A total of 1,482 bees were captured, including four genera and at least 31 species. We observed differences in the abundance and richness of species sampled among sites. Climatic variables, mostly relative humidity, explained twice more of the observed differences in the Euglossini communities than simple spatial variation. Our study found differences in the composition of euglossine bee communities as well as in their patterns of abundance and dominance among different vegetation formations. However, the level of pairwise similarity among the Euglossini communities sampled, although highly variable, was not related to climatic factors or geographical distances between the sampling sites. The greatest dissimilarities in the composition of the orchid bee communities were observed between sites around 400 km from each other rather than among sites that were further apart. A possible explanation is that the sampled areas that were 400 km from each other were also highly dissimilar regarding climate, especially altitude.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document