scholarly journals Recent progresses in the phenomenological description for the indentation size effect in microhardness testing of brittle ceramics

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danyu Jiang
1993 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 1028-1032 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Li ◽  
A. Ghosh ◽  
Y.H. Han ◽  
R.C. Bradt

The role of friction between the microhardness indenter and the test specimen is addressed through the analysis of dry (unlubricated) and lubricated tests on iron by Atkinson and Shi. Quantitative evaluation through a proportional specimen resistance model accurately describes the results. It suggests that friction is a major portion of the observed hardness increase at low test loads, the indentation size effect. The ISE is related to the surface-area-to-volume ratio of the indentation, which is inversely related to the indentation dimension.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 18-00545-18-00545
Author(s):  
Shota HASUNUMA ◽  
Hirohisa MIYAZAKI ◽  
Takeshi OGAWA

Author(s):  
A. Bandini ◽  
D. Chicot ◽  
P. Berry ◽  
X. Decoopman ◽  
A. Pertuz ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2908-2915 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Atkinson

The variation of apparent hardness observed in previously reported Vickers indentation tests of metals is reexamined. Common deseriptions of the effect are shown to be inaccurate: the variation of apparent hardness is monotonic but not simple. The effect is consistent with varying size of a previously postulated “plastic hinge” at the perimeter of the indent. This complexity confers uncertainty on the estimation of characteristic macrohardness from small scale tests. Association of the indentation size effect with friction and with strain hardening is confirmed.


2008 ◽  
Vol 56 (14) ◽  
pp. 3338-3343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ju-Young Kim ◽  
Seung-Kyun Kang ◽  
Julia R. Greer ◽  
Dongil Kwon

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 15-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyudmyla Baikova ◽  
Tatiana Pesina ◽  
Dmitry Sakseyev ◽  
Alexander Fainleib ◽  
Vladimir Bershtein

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document