scholarly journals Feasibility, Validity and Differences in Adolescent and Adult EQ-5D-Y Health State Valuation in Australia and Spain: An Application of Best–Worst Scaling

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 499-513
Author(s):  
Kim Dalziel ◽  
Max Catchpool ◽  
Borja García-Lorenzo ◽  
Inigo Gorostiza ◽  
Richard Norman ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 705-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liv A. Augestad ◽  
Kim Rand-Hendriksen ◽  
Knut Stavem ◽  
Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eunice Lobo ◽  
Lipika Nanda ◽  
Shuchi Sree Akhouri ◽  
Chandni Shrivastava ◽  
Roshan Ronghang ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 1091-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjeewa Kularatna ◽  
Jennifer A. Whitty ◽  
Newell W. Johnson ◽  
Paul A. Scuffham

Author(s):  
John Brazier ◽  
Julie Ratcliffe ◽  
Joshua A. Salomon ◽  
Aki Tsuchiya

This chapter focuses upon the needs of two approaches, economic evaluations based on decision analytic models, and those alongside clinical trials in terms of the collection and analysis of health state values. The first section of the chapter presents requirements that are likely to be common to any study in which health state values are collected from patients and/or members of the general population, including: who to ask, mode of administration, timing of assessments, sample size, and handling uncertainty. The second section of the chapter considers issues specific to trial-based economic evaluations, and the final section considers issues specific to the design and analysis of health state valuation data for economic models.


1997 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 1641-1652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul F.M. Krabbe ◽  
Marie-Louise Essink-Bot ◽  
Gouke J. Bonsel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document