Smoothed particle hydrodynamics for blood flow analysis: development of particle lifecycle algorithm

Author(s):  
Marko Topalovic ◽  
Aleksandar Nikolic ◽  
Vladimir Milovanovic ◽  
Snezana Vulovic ◽  
Milos Ivanovic
2011 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 1547-1560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Huang ◽  
Weijie Zhang ◽  
Wuwei Mao ◽  
Chen Jin

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 465-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrés Caballero ◽  
Wenbin Mao ◽  
Liang Liang ◽  
John Oshinski ◽  
Charles Primiano ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jun Imasato ◽  
Yuzuru Sakai

In this study a new computational algorithm to enforce incompressibility in free surface flow analysis using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) is presented. The method uses two steps. The first step is a fractional step for solving velocity field forward in time without incompressibility. Then the second step is computed to compensate the pressure Poisson equation using the mass constant equation in a particle field. This method is composed of the above two steps and is similar to SMAC (Simplified Marker and Cell) method commonly used in CFD. However in SPH simulation, the introduction of incompressibility of fluid is easily realized using the particle density concept and the boundary of free surface of fluid is also controlled conveniently by the concept. In this study the algorithm is applied to sloshing problems of vessels with fluid. The numerical results using this algorithm show good results in the behaviors of free surface flow and the pressure evaluations at the wall of the vessels.


Author(s):  
Mahsa Tajdari ◽  
Bruce L. Tai

The objective of this study is to investigate smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method in simulating drilling process of both brittle and ductile materials. Drilling simulation is commonly performed by finite element method (FEM); however, it is challenging when applied to small debris generated by brittle materials or special cutting tools, due to the inability to capture small chip interactions. SPH was originally developed for flow analysis but has been recently used in cutting research. In this study, SPH is compared with FEM by four case studies. The results show that SPH can simulate ductile drilling, but the chip formation and forces are not as reasonable as FEM. On the other hand, SPH can capture small fragmented debris in brittle material drilling, which cannot be done by FEM with an equivalent mesh size. SPH method is also found to be affected by the distance between the particles (element size in FEM) and numerical errors on the free surfaces, both of which require further investigation beyond this paper.


2008 ◽  
Vol 96 (6) ◽  
pp. 263-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Mounif ◽  
V. Bellenger ◽  
A. Ammar ◽  
R. Ata ◽  
P. Mazabraud ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document