Eye-Movements, Training Structures, and Stimulus Equivalence Class Formation

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 461-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedram Sadeghi ◽  
Erik Arntzen
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Equivalence Class ◽  
Stimulus Equivalence ◽  
Class Formation ◽  
Training Structures ◽  
Equivalence Class Formation

Effects of preliminary class membership on subsequent stimulus equivalence class formation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol J. McPheters ◽  
Kenneth F. Reeve ◽  
Daniel M. Fienup ◽  
Sharon A. Reeve ◽  
Ruth M. DeBar
Keyword(s):  
Equivalence Class ◽  
Stimulus Equivalence ◽  
Class Formation ◽  
Class Membership ◽  
Equivalence Class Formation

scholarly journals Relation between Exclusion and Stimulus Equivalence Class Formation in Auditory-Visual and Visual-Visual Matching in Preschoolers

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elberto A. Plazas ◽  
Deby Cortés
Keyword(s):  
Comparison Stimulus ◽  
Equivalence Class ◽  
Stimulus Equivalence ◽  
Class Formation ◽  
Stimulus Selection ◽  
Visual Modality ◽  
Response Stimulus ◽  
Equivalence Class Formation ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group 2

The hypothesis that exclusion performance is a prerequisite for the stimulus equivalence class formation was assessed in preschoolers of about 5 years of age. In Experiment 1, two groups of children were trained in a set of conditional discriminations in a two-choice matching to sample format, Group 1 in an auditory-visual modality baseline, and Group 2 in a visual-visual modality baseline. Exclusion test trials included an undefined (not previously related) comparison stimulus, and a defined (i.e., related in the baseline) comparison stimulus, in the presence of an undefined sample stimulus. Selection of the undefined comparison was recorded as a correct response. Stimulus equivalence class formation was assessed by way of symmetry and transitivity test trials. Experiment 2 replicated the design of the first experiment, with the difference that exclusion was assessed independently and with a different baseline from symmetry and transitivity. Exclusion scores were higher for the auditory-visual groups than the visual-visual groups. In both modalities symmetry scores were superior to those in transitivity. Symmetry showed independent from the exclusion performance, but transitivity was presumably dependent from it in the auditory-visual modality.

Effects of select and reject control on equivalence class formation and transfer of function

2015 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
William F. Perez ◽  
Gerson Y. Tomanari ◽  
Manish Vaidya
Keyword(s):  
Equivalence Class ◽  
Class Formation ◽  
Transfer Of Function ◽  
Equivalence Class Formation

Untrained Temporal Differentiation and Equivalence Class Formation

1998 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Anne Rehfeldt ◽  
Linda J. Hayes
Keyword(s):  
Equivalence Class ◽  
Class Formation ◽  
Temporal Differentiation ◽  
Equivalence Class Formation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document