A New Approach on Multiobjective Higher-Order Symmetric Duality Under Cone-Invexity

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 479-495
Author(s):  
Khushboo Verma ◽  
Jai Prakash Verma ◽  
Izhar Ahmad
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 321-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khushboo Verma ◽  
Pankaj Mathur ◽  
Tilak Raj Gulati

1977 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 369-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. MacDonald

A new approach to a class of regular perturbation problems of common occurrence in lubrication theory is presented. The approach is not dependent on extensive algebraic manipulation and predicts results which, apart from numerical rounding error, are in exact agreement with standard theory. Three illustrative examples are studied in detail and it is demonstrated that asymptotic approximations obtained through use of the approach can be of a substantially higher order than approximations at present in the literature.


1949 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leon Henkin

Although several proofs have been published showing the completeness of the propositional calculus (cf. Quine (1)), for the first-order functional calculus only the original completeness proof of Gödel (2) and a variant due to Hilbert and Bernays have appeared. Aside from novelty and the fact that it requires less formal development of the system from the axioms, the new method of proof which is the subject of this paper possesses two advantages. In the first place an important property of formal systems which is associated with completeness can now be generalized to systems containing a non-denumerable infinity of primitive symbols. While this is not of especial interest when formal systems are considered as logics—i.e., as means for analyzing the structure of languages—it leads to interesting applications in the field of abstract algebra. In the second place the proof suggests a new approach to the problem of completeness for functional calculi of higher order. Both of these matters will be taken up in future papers.The system with which we shall deal here will contain as primitive symbolsand certain sets of symbols as follows:(i) propositional symbols (some of which may be classed as variables, others as constants), and among which the symbol “f” above is to be included as a constant;(ii) for each number n = 1, 2, … a set of functional symbols of degree n (which again may be separated into variables and constants); and(iii) individual symbols among which variables must be distinguished from constants. The set of variables must be infinite.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document