Combinatorial aspects of the Löwenstein avoidance rule. Part I: the independence polynomial

According to Löwenstein's rule, Al–O–Al bridges are forbidden in the aluminosilicate framework of zeolites. A graph-theoretical interpretation of the rule, based on the concept of independent sets, was proposed earlier. It was shown that one can apply the vector method to the associated periodic net and define a maximal Al/(Al+Si) ratio for any aluminosilicate framework following the rule; this ratio was called the independence ratio of the net. According to this method, the determination of the independence ratio of a periodic net requires finding a subgroup of the translation group of the net for which the quotient graph and a fundamental transversal have the same independence ratio. This article and a companion paper deal with practical issues regarding the calculation of the independence ratio of mainly 2-periodic nets and the determination of site distributions realizing this ratio. The first paper describes a calculation technique based on propositional calculus and introduces a multivariate polynomial, called the independence polynomial. This polynomial can be calculated in an automatic way and provides the list of all maximal independent sets of the graph, hence also the value of its independence ratio. Some properties of this polynomial are discussed; the independence polynomials of some simple graphs, such as short paths or cycles, are determined as examples of calculation techniques. The method is also applied to the determination of the independence ratio of the 2-periodic net dhc.

A Complete Axiomatisation for Quantifier-Free Separation Logic

We present the first complete axiomatisation for quantifier-free separation logic. The logic is equipped with the standard concrete heaplet semantics and the proof system has no external feature such as nominals/labels. It is not possible to rely completely on proof systems for Boolean BI as the concrete semantics needs to be taken into account. Therefore, we present the first internal Hilbert-style axiomatisation for quantifier-free separation logic. The calculus is divided in three parts: the axiomatisation of core formulae where Boolean combinations of core formulae capture the expressivity of the whole logic, axioms and inference rules to simulate a bottom-up elimination of separating connectives, and finally structural axioms and inference rules from propositional calculus and Boolean BI with the magic wand.

On Proof Complexities Relations in Some Systems of Propositional Calculus

The number of linear proofs steps for some sets of formulas is compared in the folowing systems of propositional calculus: PK – seguent system with cut rule, PK— - the same system without cut rule, SPK – the same system with substitution rule, QPK – the same system with quantifier rules. The number of steps of tree-like proofs in the same systems for some considered set of formulas is compared from Alessandra Carbone in [1] and some distinctive property of the system QPK is revealed: QPK has an exponential speed-up over the systems SPK and PK, which, in their turn, have an exponential speed-up over the system PK—. This result drew the heavy interest for the study of the system QPK. In this work for linear proofs steps in the same systems the other relations are received: it is showed that the system QPK has no preference over the system SPK, it is showed also that for the considered formula sets the system PK has no preference over the system PK—, which, in its turn, has no preference over the monotone system PMon. It is proved also, that the same results are reliable for some other sets of formulas and for other systems as well.

Gently Paraconsistent Calculi

In this paper, we consider some paraconsistent calculi in a Hilbert-style formulation with the rule of detachment as the sole rule of interference. Each calculus will be expected to contain all axiom schemas of the positive fragment of classical propositional calculus and respect the principle of gentle explosion.

Classical Logic in the Quantum Context

It is generally accepted that quantum mechanics entails a revision of the classical propositional calculus as a consequence of its physical content. However, the universal claim according to which a new quantum logic is indispensable in order to model the propositions of every quantum theory is challenged. In the present essay, we critically discuss this claim by showing that classical logic can be rehabilitated in a quantum context by taking into account Bohmian mechanics. It will be argued, indeed, that such a theoretical framework provides the necessary conceptual tools to reintroduce a classical logic of experimental propositions by virtue of its clear metaphysical picture and its theory of measurement. More precisely, it will be shown that the rehabilitation of a classical propositional calculus is a consequence of the primitive ontology of the theory, a fact that is not yet sufficiently recognized in the literature concerning Bohmian mechanics. This work aims to fill this gap.

Shortening of Proof Length is Elusive for Theorem Provers

There are many examples of failed strategies whose intention is to optimize a process but instead they produce worse results than no strategy at all. Many fall under the loose umbrella of the “no free lunch theorem”. In this paper we present an example in which a simple (but assumedly naive) strategy intended to shorten proof lengths in the propositional calculus produces results that are significantly worse than those achieved without any method to try to shorten proofs.This contrast with what was to be expected intuitively, namely no improvement in the length of the proofs. Another surprising result is how early the naive strategy failed. We set up a experiment in which we sample random classical propositional theorems and then feed them to two very popular automatic theorem provers (AProS and Prover9). We then compared the length of the proofs obtained under two methods: (1) the application of the theorem provers with no additional information; (2) the addition of new (redundant) axioms to the provers. The second method produced even longer proofs than the first one.

Classical Logic with n Truth Values as a Symmetric Many-Valued Logic

We introduce Boolean-like algebras of dimension n ($$n{\mathrm {BA}}$$ n BA s) having n constants $${{{\mathsf {e}}}}_1,\ldots ,{{{\mathsf {e}}}}_n$$ e 1 , … , e n , and an $$(n+1)$$ ( n + 1 ) -ary operation q (a “generalised if-then-else”) that induces a decomposition of the algebra into n factors through the so-called n-central elements. Varieties of $$n{\mathrm {BA}}$$ n BA s share many remarkable properties with the variety of Boolean algebras and with primal varieties. The $$n{\mathrm {BA}}$$ n BA s provide the algebraic framework for generalising the classical propositional calculus to the case of n–perfectly symmetric–truth-values. Every finite-valued tabular logic can be embedded into such a n-valued propositional logic, $$n{\mathrm {CL}}$$ n CL , and this embedding preserves validity. We define a confluent and terminating first-order rewriting system for deciding validity in $$n{\mathrm {CL}}$$ n CL , and, via the embeddings, in all the finite tabular logics.