Quantum Algorithm for the Discrete Logarithm Problem, 1994; Shor

Author(s):  
Phillip Kaye ◽  
Raymond Laflamme ◽  
Michele Mosca

In this chapter we examine one of two main classes of algorithms: quantum algorithms that solve problems with a complexity that is superpolynomially less than the complexity of the best-known classical algorithm for the same problem. That is, the complexity of the best-known classical algorithm cannot be bounded above by any polynomial in the complexity of the quantum algorithm. The algorithms we will detail all make use of the quantum Fourier transform (QFT). We start off the chapter by studying the problem of quantum phase estimation, which leads us naturally to the QFT. Section 7.1 also looks at using the QFT to find the period of periodic states, and introduces some elementary number theory that is needed in order to post-process the quantum algorithm. In Section 7.2, we apply phase estimation in order to estimate eigenvalues of unitary operators. Then in Section 7.3, we apply the eigenvalue estimation algorithm in order to derive the quantum factoring algorithm, and in Section 7.4 to solve the discrete logarithm problem. In Section 7.5, we introduce the hidden subgroup problem which encompasses both the order finding and discrete logarithm problem as well as many others. This chapter by no means exhaustively covers the quantum algorithms that are superpolynomially faster than any known classical algorithm, but it does cover the most well-known such algorithms. In Section 7.6, we briefly discuss other quantum algorithms that appear to provide a superpolynomial advantage. To introduce the idea of phase estimation, we begin by noting that the final Hadamard gate in the Deutsch algorithm, and the Deutsch–Jozsa algorithm, was used to get at information encoded in the relative phases of a state. The Hadamard gate is self-inverse and thus does the opposite as well, namely it can be used to encode information into the phases. To make this concrete, first consider H acting on the basis state |x⟩ (where x ∊ {0, 1}). It is easy to see that You can think about the Hadamard gate as having encoded information about the value of x into the relative phases between the basis states |0⟩ and |1⟩.


2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (7&8) ◽  
pp. 610-621
Author(s):  
D. Maslov ◽  
J. Mathew ◽  
D. Cheung ◽  
D.K. Pradhan

We consider a quantum polynomial-time algorithm which solves the discrete logarithm problem for points on elliptic curves over $GF(2^m)$. We improve over earlier algorithms by constructing an efficient circuit for multiplying elements of binary finite fields and by representing elliptic curve points using a technique based on projective coordinates. The depth of our proposed implementation, executable in the Linear Nearest Neighbor (LNN) architecture, is $O(m^2)$, which is an improvement over the previous bound of $O(m^3)$ derived assuming no architectural restrictions.


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Childs ◽  
Gábor Ivanyos

AbstractWe describe an efficient quantum algorithm for computing discrete logarithms in semigroups using Shor's algorithms for period finding and the discrete logarithm problem as subroutines. Thus proposed cryptosystems based on the presumed hardness of discrete logarithms in semigroups are insecure against quantum attacks. In contrast, we show that some generalizations of the discrete logarithm problem are hard in semigroups despite being easy in groups. We relate a shifted version of the discrete logarithm problem in semigroups to the dihedral hidden subgroup problem, and we show that the constructive membership problem with respect to


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Huang ◽  
Zhaofeng Su ◽  
Fangguo Zhang ◽  
Yong Ding ◽  
Rong Cheng

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document