BRE Wind Engineering Research Group

1981 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 429
1998 ◽  
Vol 77-78 ◽  
pp. 663-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Partha P Sarkar ◽  
Kishor C Mehta ◽  
Richard E Peterson ◽  
James R McDonald

Author(s):  
Ernst W. Kiesling ◽  
James R. McDonald ◽  
Kishor C. Mehta ◽  
Partha P. Sarkar

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3.4) ◽  
pp. 177
Author(s):  
M ABOULKHIR ◽  
S BOUREKKADI ◽  
S KHOULJI ◽  
K SLIMANI ◽  
M L. KERKEB

This scientific work concerning an examination on automatic speech recognition (ASR) frameworks connected with the home automation and to express the importance of this academic work, an itemized investigation of the engineering of speech recognition frameworks was completed. Our goal in Information Systems Engineering Research Group ofAbdelmalekEssaadi University is to choose a speech recognition programming that must work in remote speech conditions and in a rowdy area.The proposed framework is using atoolbox called Kaldi, which must correspond as aclient created by an advanced programming language, with any home automation framework. 


1979 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-57
Author(s):  
W C Hutton

The Polytechnic of Central London is situated within close proximity of some of the best research hospitals in the country. It was about ten years ago that the clinician became more aware of the contribution that the engineer could make in medicine and it was at that time that the multi-disciplinary Bio-engineering Research Group was formed at the PCL. The Group works within the School of Engineering and Science and is funded by the Polytechnic and the following grant awarding bodies: MRC, SRC, EEC and the National Fund for Research into Crippling Diseases. The staff consists at present of two members of the teaching staff, two research fellows, three research assistants and two research students.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian A. Burt

This article advances the Theoretical Model of Engineering Professorial Intentions to explain why individuals do or do not choose to pursue faculty careers. A 13-month ethnographic study of members of a diverse chemical engineering research group was conducted. The resulting theoretical model accounts for six emergent components that contribute to members’ identification with faculty careers: (1) social identities and personal factors; (2) sociocultural factors; (3) participation, interactions, and learning in research group experiences; (4) faculty prototype; (5) social comparisons; and (6) individual and institutional experiences. The article concludes with implications for further research and recommendations regarding mentoring and design of research group experiences that may promote greater interest in and identification with the professoriate.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian A. Burt

Purpose In some fields, research group experiences gained in laboratories are more influential than the classroom in shaping graduate students’ research abilities, understandings of post-graduate careers and professional identities. However, little is known about what and how students learn from their research group experiences. This paper aims to explore the learning experiences of engineering graduate students in one chemical engineering research group to determine what students learned and to identify the practices and activities that facilitated their learning. Design/methodology/approach Ethnography was used to observe the experiences of one research group in chemical engineering. Fieldwork included 13 months of observations, 31 formal interviews (16 first-round and 15 second-round interviews) and informal interviews. Fieldnotes and transcriptions were analyzed using grounded theory techniques. Findings Research group members developed four dominant competencies: presenting research, receiving and responding to feedback, solving problems and troubleshooting problems. Students’ learning was facilitated by the practices and activities of the research group (e.g. weekly full group and subgroup meetings) and mediated through the interactions of others (i.e. peers, faculty supervisor and lab manager). Originality/value This study adds to the engineering education literature and contributes to the larger discourse on identifying promising practices and activities that improve student learning in graduate education.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document