Magma addition and possible decoupling of major- and trace-element behaviour in the Bushveld Complex, South Africa

1983 ◽  
Vol 39 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 335-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.Grant Cawthorn
Lithos ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 310-311 ◽  
pp. 332-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Günther ◽  
K.M. Haase ◽  
M. Junge ◽  
T. Oberthür ◽  
D. Woelki ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 106 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 171-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.L. Reid ◽  
R.G. Cawthorn ◽  
F.J. Kruger ◽  
M. Tredoux

2013 ◽  
Vol 107 (6) ◽  
pp. 915-942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Yudovskaya ◽  
Judith Kinnaird ◽  
Anthony J. Naldrett ◽  
Nickolay Rodionov ◽  
Anton Antonov ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 815-832 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. V. Eales

Abstract The composition of magmas proposed as parental to the layered suite of the Bushveld Complex, and some models for the manner of their emplacement, are reviewed briefly. Included are some contributions published in South Africa, with which overseas readers might be less familiar. Emphasis is given to the broader features of the cumulates, and the contradictions raised by whole-rock compositional, Sr-isotopic, and trace-element data that cloud their correlation with proposed parental magmas. It is concluded that the Lower, Critical and Main Zones are the derivatives of only two primary magmatic lineages, while a third was added to residual liquids from which the layered rocks above the Pyroxenite Marker were formed. Excessive amounts of olivine and chromium in the cumulates of the Lower and Lower Critical Zones in the northern sector of the Western Limb can seemingly not be accounted for by the composition and volume of the putative magmas. This is attributed to (1) this sector being a proximal facies located close to the original feeder, and/or (2) crystal-charged magma batches, expelled from a lower magma chamber, being periodically injected into and dispersed within the liquids already in place in the Bushveld chamber. Thus, ongoing changes in the bulk composition of the liquids within the chamber would not be reflected in the rinds of earlier, chilled-facies rocks. The expulsion of significant volumes of liquid residua from the chamber during cumulate deposition is not ruled out.


2020 ◽  
Vol 123 (4) ◽  
pp. 655-668
Author(s):  
N. Lenhardt ◽  
W. Altermann ◽  
F. Humbert ◽  
M. de Kock

Abstract The Palaeoproterozoic Hekpoort Formation of the Pretoria Group is a lava-dominated unit that has a basin-wide extent throughout the Transvaal sub-basin of South Africa. Additional correlative units may be present in the Kanye sub-basin of Botswana. The key characteristic of the formation is its general geochemical uniformity. Volcaniclastic and other sedimentary rocks are relatively rare throughout the succession but may be dominant in some locations. Hekpoort Formation outcrops are sporadic throughout the basin and mostly occur in the form of gentle hills and valleys, mainly encircling Archaean domes and the Palaeoproterozoic Bushveld Complex (BC). The unit is exposed in the western Pretoria Group basin, sitting unconformably either on the Timeball Hill Formation or Boshoek Formation, which is lenticular there, and on top of the Boshoek Formation in the east of the basin. The unit is unconformably overlain by the Dwaalheuwel Formation. The type-locality for the Hekpoort Formation is the Hekpoort farm (504 IQ Hekpoort), ca. 60 km to the west-southwest of Pretoria. However, no stratotype has ever been proposed. A lectostratotype, i.e., the Mooikloof area in Pretoria East, that can be enhanced by two reference stratotypes are proposed herein. The Hekpoort Formation was deposited in a cratonic subaerial setting, forming a large igneous province (LIP) in which short-termed localised ponds and small braided river systems existed. It therefore forms one of the major Palaeoproterozoic magmatic events on the Kaapvaal Craton.


2019 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 569-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix E.D. Kaufmann ◽  
Marie C. Hoffmann ◽  
Kai Bachmann ◽  
Ilya V. Veksler ◽  
Robert B. Trumbull ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document