Automating physical system modelling using bond graphs

1989 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 584-588
Author(s):  
S.J. Hood ◽  
E.R. Palmer ◽  
D.H. Withers
1987 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
pp. 384-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Hogan

Decomposition and reassembly of a physical system should not change the form of its describing equations; the physics and mechanics describing each component of a machine remain the same whether the components are separate or assembled into a complete system. In general, the differential equations used to model physical systems do not share this property. This paper considers restrictions on the structure of mathematical models of physical systems which endow the equations with the same modularity as the physical system. It is shown that models based on nonenergic junctions (ideal series and parallel connections) cannot guarantee this property. Generalized energic junction structures are proposed and it is shown that they are sufficient to guarantee modularity.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Carlos Mancilla ◽  
Emmanuel López Neri ◽  
Luis A. Hermenegildo Dominguez

1987 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
pp. 378-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. Rosenberg

Causality as a concept and a tool associated with bond graphs has seen use for more than twenty years. Our principal purpose in this paper is to bring together several different views and applications of causality in order to suggest how valuable it can be in understanding the dynamic structure of models. The topics considered include causality assignment, both traditional and nontraditional, and state equations; design assessment of models based on direct interpretation; and junction structure properties. The topics are illustrated by examples. Some opportunities for additional research into causality properties and applications are suggested.


1990 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 48-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.R. Leitch ◽  
M.E. Wiegand ◽  
H.C. Quek

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document