Sample size estimates for the use of human bone in the experimental study of cancellous screw extraction mechanics

1996 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 569-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.C. Hearn ◽  
J.P. Szalai ◽  
J.F. Surowiak ◽  
J. Schatzker
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Sample Size ◽  
Human Bone ◽  
Cancellous Screw ◽  
Size Estimates

P1-410: SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATES FOR SECONDARY PREVENTION STUDIES USING REGIONAL ATROPHY RATES

2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (7S_Part_8) ◽  
pp. P461-P462
Author(s):  
David M. Cash ◽  
Thomas Veale ◽  
Teresa Poole ◽  
Marc Modat ◽  
Erika Molteni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Sample Size ◽  
Prevention Studies ◽  
Size Estimates

scholarly journals Sample Size Estimates for Clinical Trials of Vasospasm in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Stroke ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 2362-2367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt T. Kreiter ◽  
Stephan A. Mayer ◽  
George Howard ◽  
Volker Knappertz ◽  
Don Ilodigwe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Sample Size ◽  
Size Estimates

Null Hypothesis Significance Testing: Ramifications, Ruminations and Recommendations

2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. K. Huysamen
Keyword(s):  
Sample Size ◽  
Confidence Intervals ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Null Hypothesis ◽  
Significance Testing ◽  
Population Parameter ◽  
Size Estimation ◽  
Null Hypothesis Significance Testing ◽  
Point Estimates ◽  
Size Estimates

Criticisms of traditional null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) became more pronounced during the 1960s and reached a climax during the past decade. Among others, NHST says nothing about the size of the population parameter of interest and its result is influenced by sample size. Estimation of confidence intervals around point estimates of the relevant parameters, model fitting and Bayesian statistics represent some major departures from conventional NHST. Testing non-nil null hypotheses, determining optimal sample size to uncover only substantively meaningful effect sizes and reporting effect-size estimates may be regarded as minor extensions of NHST. Although there seems to be growing support for the estimation of confidence intervals around point estimates of the relevant parameters, it is unlikely that NHST-based procedures will disappear in the near future. In the meantime, it is widely accepted that effect-size estimates should be reported as a mandatory adjunct to conventional NHST results.

scholarly journals Test-retest reliability and sample size estimates after MRI scanner relocation

NeuroImage ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 211 ◽  
pp. 116608
Author(s):  
Tracy R. Melzer ◽  
Ross J. Keenan ◽  
Gareth J. Leeper ◽  
Stephen Kingston-Smith ◽  
Simon A. Felton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sample Size ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Size Estimates

scholarly journals Calculating Sample Size Estimates for RNA Sequencing Data

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 970-978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven N. Hart ◽  
Terry M. Therneau ◽  
Yuji Zhang ◽  
Gregory A. Poland ◽  
Jean-Pierre Kocher
Keyword(s):  
Sample Size ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Size Estimates

scholarly journals Why sample size estimates?

2018 ◽  
pp. emermed-2018-207763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen J Weber ◽  
Zhe Hui Hoo
Keyword(s):  
Sample Size ◽  
Size Estimates

Sample Size Estimates for 2k-p Designs with Binary Responses

1995 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 344-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Søren Bisgaard ◽  
Howard T. Fuller
Keyword(s):  
Sample Size ◽  
Binary Responses ◽  
Size Estimates
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document