Boundary integral solutions of geoelectric potential problems for the perturbing body of extreme conductivity

2007 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Rudolphi

<br /><br /> <table width="530" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td align="left" valign="top"> <a name="abstract"></a> <span class="subtitle" style="font-weight:bold">Abstract</span><br /> <p><img src="http://ejbe.libraries.rutgers.edu/files/rizzo.gif" align=left HSPACE=20>This is the first of two special issues of the Electronic Journal of Boundary Elements dedicated to Frank Rizzo. To say that Frank Rizzo played an important role in the development of what he referred to as “boundary integral equations� would not give much credit to where much credit is due. While it could be argued that the use of integral equations to formulate and form a computational basis of many of the problems of applied mathematics and engineering would probably have been inevitably developed, it was Frank’s seminal work on using the integral equation approach to classical elastostatics that set a whole new research area into motion. His dissertation (which we thought would be of interest to include in this issue) topic, as suggested by his mentor Marvin Stippes at the University of Illinois, and subsequently so well documented in the oft-cited paper “An Integral Equation Approach to Boundary Value Problems of Classical Elastostatics�, Quarterly of Applied Mechanics, 1967, represented the quantum step in the use of integral equations for classical scalar potential problems to the vector potential problems of practical engineering significance. The theoretical basis for this development was Betti’s reciprocal work theorem with the fundamental (response to a point force) solution of the equations of elastostatics, but it was Frank Rizzo who actually breathed the new life into this classical mathematics. A nontrivial contribution of Frank’s original work was to not only to achieve the singular integral equation formulation, but also the systematic methodology of reducing the elegant integral equation formulation to well conditioned, linear algebraic equations by proper analytical integration of the singular terms. Those combined theoretical and practical developments by Frank set into motion a whole new and modern approach to numerically solving partial differential equations, at least of the elliptic type. With Frank’s hard work and the recognition of its elegance and potential by several of his early disciples, the integral equation method blossomed into a powerful and practical computational methodology that would eventually be called “boundary elements�. Amongst the early disciples of the integral equation method, several of which contributed significantly to advancing the methodology to a sophisticated and now mature state, are the authors of this issue and its sequel dedicated to Frank. It is undoubtedly fair to say that most of these authors were, at one time or even continuously, colleagues and personal friends of Frank Rizzo. Frank’s contributions to the boundary integral equation method spanned nearly four decades, from roughly 1964 to 2001. I, too, have been very privileged to become involved with this field in the 1970’s and later to work side by side with Frank, especially in that part of the development of the methodology for what is now referred to as “hypersingular� integral equations. I’m sure that all the present authors can recall numerous occasions and conversations with Frank on a technical point or issue regarding the application of “his� boundary integral method to their own problem of interest. Throughout his productive career, his easy going, collegial, engaging, yet rigorous style earned him respect and admiration that surely befits the “father� of modern boundary integral methods. This commemorative sequence of two issues represents only a small token of tribute and recognition that Frank Rizzo so much deserves for his “singular� contributions to the field that he virtually invented, developed, promoted and nurtured to maturity. Thomas J. Rudolphi Iowa State University <br /><br /><br /> </td> </tr> </table>


1993 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 1425-1434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza M. Khanbilvardi ◽  
Shabbir Ahmed ◽  
Ali M. Sadegh

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Jufeng Wang ◽  
Fengxin Sun ◽  
Ying Xu

The interpolating boundary element-free method (IBEFM) is a direct solution method of the meshless boundary integral equation method, which has high efficiency and accuracy. The IBEFM is developed based on the interpolating moving least-squares (IMLS) method and the boundary integral equation method. Since the shape function of the IMLS method satisfies the interpolation characteristics, the IBEFM can directly and accurately impose the essential boundary conditions, which overcomes the shortcomings of the original boundary element-free method in enforcing the essential boundary approximately. This paper will study the error estimations of the IBEFM for two-dimensional potential problems and the relationship between the errors and the influence radius and the condition number of the coefficient matrix. Two numerical examples are presented to verify the correctness of the theoretical results in this paper.


2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 385-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. C. Shiah ◽  
M. R. Hematiyan ◽  
Y. H. Chen

AbstractIn the conventional boundary element analysis, near-singularities are present in the associated boundary integral equation for problems involving ultra-thin media. For this case, any conventional numerical schemes will fail to yield proper values for the integrals. In this paper, the boundary integrals of the boundary element method for 3D potential problems are fully regularized by the technique of integration by parts under the local coordinate system. The fully regularized integrands are expressed as very explicit formulations that can be easily programmed into a computer code. Numerical tests carried out for a typical case have verified the accuracy of the approach for any orders of small distance between the source and the element under integration.


2010 ◽  
Vol 02 (02) ◽  
pp. 421-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
BAODONG DAI ◽  
YUMIN CHENG

Combining the local boundary integral equation with the improved moving least-squares (IMLS) approximation, an improved local boundary integral equation (ILBIE) method for two-dimensional potential problems is presented in this paper. In the IMLS approximation, the weighted orthogonal functions are used as basis functions. The IMLS approximation has greater computational efficiency and precision than the existing moving least-squares (MLS) approximation and does not lead to an ill-conditioned equations system. The corresponding formulae of the ILBIE method are obtained. Comparing with the conventional local boundary integral equation (LBIE) method, the ILBIE method is a direct meshless boundary integral equation method in which the basic unknown quantity is the real solution of the nodal variables, and the boundary conditions can be implemented directly and easily as in the finite element method. The ILBIE method has greater computational efficiency and precision. Some numerical examples to demonstrate the efficiency of the method are presented in this paper.


2009 ◽  
Vol 228 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svetlana Tlupova ◽  
Ricardo Cortez

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document