Modification of human postural response to leg muscle vibration by electrical vestibular stimulation

1995 ◽  
Vol 189 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Hlavačka ◽  
M. Križková ◽  
F.B. Horak
2007 ◽  
pp. 829-832
Author(s):  
O Dzurková ◽  
F Hlavačka

To investigate the vestibular and somatosensory interaction in human postural control, a galvanic vestibular stimulation of cosine bell shape resulting in a small forward or backward body lean was paired with three vibrations of both soleus muscles. The induced body lean was registered by the position of the center of foot pressure (CoP). During a quiet stance with eyes closed the vibration of both soleus muscles with frequency (of) 40 Hz, 60 Hz and 80 Hz resulted in the body lean backward with velocities related to the vibration frequencies. The vestibular galvanic stimulation with the head turned to the right caused forward or backward modification of CoP backward response to the soleus muscles vibration and peaked at 1.5-2 s following the onset of the vibration. The effect of the paired stimulation was larger than the summation of the vestibular stimulation during the quiet stance and a leg muscle vibration alone. The enhancement of the galvanic stimulation was related to the velocity of body lean induced by the leg muscle vibration. The galvanic vestibular stimulation during a faster body movement had larger effects than during a slow body lean or the quiet stance. The results suggest that velocity of a body postural movement or incoming proprioceptive signal from postural muscles potentiate the effects of simultaneous vestibular stimulations on posture.


2005 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S125
Author(s):  
P. Vlach ◽  
J. Otahal ◽  
S. Otahal

2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.D. Latt ◽  
P.J. Sparto ◽  
J.M. Furman ◽  
M.S. Redfern

2020 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. 2010-2023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Etienne Guillaud ◽  
Céline Faure ◽  
Emilie Doat ◽  
Laurent J. Bouyer ◽  
Dominique Guehl ◽  
...  

This study addresses the extent of conservation of trunk muscle control in humans. Results show that galvanic vestibular stimulation-evoked vestibular responses in trunk muscles remain strong in conditions where leg muscle responses are downmodulated (walking, standing, microgravity). This suggests a phylogenetically conserved blueprint of sensorimotor organization, with strongly hardwired vestibulospinal inputs to axial motoneurons and a higher degree of flexibility in the later emerging limb control system.


2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Glasser ◽  
R. Collings ◽  
J. Paton ◽  
J. Marsden

1998 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1608-1612 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. S. Gurfinkel ◽  
Yu. S. Levik ◽  
O. V. Kazennikov ◽  
V. A. Selionov
Keyword(s):  

2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 1737-1747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. P. Ivanenko ◽  
R. Grasso ◽  
F. Lacquaniti

We studied the effect of vibratory stimulation of different leg muscles [bilateral quadriceps (Q), hamstring (HS) muscles, triceps surae (TS), and tibialis anterior (TA)] in seven normal subjects during 1) quiet standing, 2) stepping in place movements, and 3) walking on the treadmill. The experiments were performed in a dimly illuminated room, and the subjects were given the instruction not to resist the applied perturbation. In one condition the velocity of the treadmill was controlled by a feedback from the subject's current position. In normal standing, TA vibration elicited a prominent forward body tilt, whereas HS and TS vibration elicited backward trunk or whole body inclination, respectively. Q vibration had little effect. During stepping in place, continuous HS vibration produced an involuntary forward stepping at about 0.3 m s− 1 without modifying the stepping frequency. When the subjects (with eyes closed) kept a hand contact with an external still object, they did not move forward but perceived an illusory forward leg flexion relative to the trunk. Q, TS, and TA vibration did not cause any systematic body translation nor illusory changes in body configuration. In treadmill locomotion, HS vibration produced an involuntary steplike increase of walking speed (by 0.1–0.6 m·s− 1). Continuous vibration elicited larger speed increments than phasic stimulation during swing or stance phase. For phasic stimulation, HS vibration tended to be more effective when applied during swing than during stance phase. Q, TA, and TS vibration had little if any effect. Vibration of thigh muscles altered the walking speed depending on the direction of progression. During backward locomotion, the walking speed tended to decrease after HS vibration, whereas it significantly increased after Q vibration. Thus the influence of leg muscle vibration on stepping in place and locomotion differed significantly from that on normal posture. We suggest that the proprioceptive input from thigh muscles may convey information about the velocity of the foot movement relative to the trunk.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document