The nature of lexical-semantic impairment in Alzheimer's disease

1989 ◽  
Vol 4 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 449-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Gainotti ◽  
U. Nocentini ◽  
A. Daniele ◽  
M.C. Silveri
2007 ◽  
Vol 65 (3a) ◽  
pp. 619-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcio L.F. Balthazar ◽  
José E. Martinelli ◽  
Fernando Cendes ◽  
Benito P. Damasceno

OBJECTIVE: To study lexical semantic memory in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) and normal controls. METHOD: Fifteen mild AD, 15 aMCI, and 15 normal control subjects were included. Diagnosis of AD was based on DSM-IV and NINCDS-ADRDA criteria, and that of aMCI, on the criteria of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment, using CDR 0.5 for aMCI and CDR 1 for mild AD. All subjects underwent semantic memory tests (Boston Naming-BNT, CAMCOG Similarities item), Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE), neuropsychological tests (counterproofs), and Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia. Data analysis used Mann-Whitney test for intergroup comparisons and Pearson's coefficient for correlations between memory tests and counterproofs (statistical significance level was p<0.05). RESULTS: aMCI patients were similar to controls on BNT and Similarities, but worse on MMSE and RAVLT. Mild AD patients scored significantly worse than aMCI and controls on all tests. CONCLUSION: aMCI impairs episodic memory but tends to spare lexical semantic system, which can be affected in the early phase of AD.


2003 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. 952-967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J Cortese ◽  
David A Balota ◽  
Susan D Sergent-Marshall ◽  
Randy L Buckner

1986 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.Jacob Huff ◽  
Suzanne Corkin ◽  
John H. Growdon

1996 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 340-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasia M. Raymer ◽  
Rita Sloan Berndt

AbstractRecent modifications of the lexical model of oral reading make the prediction that under conditions where sublexical reading processes alone cannot achieve the target pronunciation (i.e., when words have exceptional spellings or when sublexical processes are impaired), patients with severe semantic impairment should have more difficulty reading aloud semantically impaired words than semantically retained words. In a battery of lexical-semantic and reading tasks, two neurologically normal control subjects and two subjects with probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) and only moderate semantic impairment read aloud all words accurately. One AD subject with severe semantic impairment was impaired in word reading but demonstrated no difference in reading words with regular and exceptional spellings. Another AD subject with severe semantic impairment read aloud without error virtually all regular and exception words. Neither severely impaired AD subject demonstrated any relationship between oral reading accuracy and semantic knowledge of exception words. These findings support a model of word reading incorporating lexical, nonsemantic processes by which lexical orthographic input representations directly activate lexical phonological output representations without the necessity of semantic mediation. (JINS, 1996, 2, 340–349.)


2003 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. 1509-1522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Perri ◽  
Giovanni A Carlesimo ◽  
Gian Daniele Zannino ◽  
Marco Mauri ◽  
Barbara Muolo ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 689-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Mauri ◽  
Irene Daum ◽  
Giuseppe Sartori ◽  
Gerlinde Riesch ◽  
Niels Birbaumer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document