Sound perception

2022 ◽  
pp. 311-319
Author(s):  
P.U.P.A Gilbert
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-42
Author(s):  
Jayeon Lim ◽  
◽  
Misun Seo
Keyword(s):  

Plant Science ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 264 ◽  
pp. 9-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Rodrigo-Moreno ◽  
Nadia Bazihizina ◽  
Elisa Azzarello ◽  
Elisa Masi ◽  
Daniel Tran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

JAMA ◽  
1918 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
John Dutton Wright
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (S1) ◽  
pp. 90-92
Author(s):  
Kimitaka Kaga ◽  
Yusuke Akamatsu ◽  
Erika Ogata ◽  
Masae Shiroma ◽  
Sinichi Ishimoto ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 7-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Kraus ◽  
Therese J. McGee ◽  
Dawn Burton Koch

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (04) ◽  
pp. 349-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Hoover ◽  
Pamela Souza

AbstractSubstantial loss of cochlear function is required to elevate pure-tone thresholds to the severe hearing loss range; yet, individuals with severe or profound hearing loss continue to rely on hearing for communication. Despite the impairment, sufficient information is encoded at the periphery to make acoustic hearing a viable option. However, the probability of significant cochlear and/or neural damage associated with the loss has consequences for sound perception and speech recognition. These consequences include degraded frequency selectivity, which can be assessed with tests including psychoacoustic tuning curves and broadband rippled stimuli. Because speech recognition depends on the ability to resolve frequency detail, a listener with severe hearing loss is likely to have impaired communication in both quiet and noisy environments. However, the extent of the impairment varies widely among individuals. A better understanding of the fundamental abilities of listeners with severe and profound hearing loss and the consequences of those abilities for communication can support directed treatment options in this population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document