The Inferior Hypogastric Plexus

Author(s):  
Stephen J. Bordes ◽  
R. Shane Tubbs
2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Balaya ◽  
Fabien Guimiot ◽  
Jean-François Uhl ◽  
Charlotte Ngo ◽  
Myriam Delomenie ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Augusto Pereira ◽  
Manuel Herrero-Trujillano ◽  
Gema Vaquero ◽  
Lucia Fuentes ◽  
Sofia Gonzalez ◽  
...  

Background: Although several treatments are currently available for chronic pelvic pain, 30–60% of patients do not respond to them. Therefore, these therapeutic options require a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying endometriosis-induced pain. This study focuses on pain management after failure of conventional therapy. Methods: We reviewed clinical data from 46 patients with endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain unresponsive to conventional therapies at Puerta de Hierro University Hospital Madrid, Spain from 2018 to 2021. Demographic data, clinical and exploratory findings, treatment received, and outcomes were collected. Results: Median age was 41.5 years, and median pain intensity was VAS: 7.8/10. Nociceptive pain and neuropathic pain were identified in 98% and 70% of patients, respectively. The most common symptom was abdominal pain (78.2%) followed by pain with sexual intercourse (65.2%), rectal pain (52.1%), and urologic pain (36.9%). A total of 43% of patients responded to treatment with neuromodulators. Combined therapies for myofascial pain syndrome, as well as treatment of visceral pain with inferior or superior hypogastric plexus blocks, proved to be very beneficial. S3 pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) plus inferior hypogastric plexus block or botulinum toxin enabled us to prolong response time by more than 3.5 months. Conclusion: Treatment of the unresponsive patient should be interdisciplinary. Depending on the history and exploratory findings, therapy should preferably be combined with neuromodulators, myofascial pain therapies, and S3 PRF plus inferior hypogastric plexus blockade.


2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Spackman ◽  
B. Wrigley ◽  
A. Roberts ◽  
M. Quinn

2003 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Drizenko ◽  
E. Goullet ◽  
B. Mauroy ◽  
X. Demondion ◽  
J.-L. Bonnal ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 249-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahar Abd-Elbaky Mohamed ◽  
Doaa Gomaa Ahmed ◽  
Mohamad Farouk Mohamad

BACKGROUND: Various interventions, including the superior hypogastric plexus block and ganglion impar block, are commonly used for the treatment of pelvic or perineal pain caused by cancer. The inferior hypogastric plexus block (performed using a trans-sacral approach under fluoroscopy and using a local anesthetics/steroid combination) for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic pain conditions involving the lower pelvic viscera was first described in 2007. Neurolysis of the inferior hypogastric plexus may be useful for the treatment of pelvic and perineal pain caused by cancer.OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility, safety and efficacy of the newly introduced inferior hypogastric plexus block, performed using a trans-sacral approach, for the relief of cancer-related pelvic and perineal pain.METHODS: A total of 20 patients with cancer pain in the pelvis and/or perineum were injected with 6 mL to 8 mL of 10% phenol bilaterally by passing a spinal needle through the sacral foramen to perform the inferior hypogastric block. Pain intensity (measured using a visual analogue scale), sleep score, activity score, psychological score and oral morphine consumption pre- and postprocedure were measured.RESULTS: Two of the 20 patients died during the follow-up period and were, therefore, excluded from the study. All patients presented with cancer-related pelvic, perineal or pelviperineal pain. Pain scores were reduced from a mean (± SD) of 7.22±1.31 preprocedurally to 4.06±1.73 one week postprocedurally (P<0.05). In addition, the mean consumption of morphine (delivered via 30 mg sustained-release morphine tablets) was reduced from 106.67±32.90 mg to 61.67±40.48 mg after one week (P<0.05). No complications or serious side effects were encountered during or after the block.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The approach provides a good alternative technique for the treatment of low pelvic and perineal cancer-related pain. Additional studies are required for evaluation and refinement of the technique using other radiological techniques.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document