Esophageal Function Tests

Author(s):  
Vinay Chandrasekhara ◽  
Sanjay Jagannath
Dysphagia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 871-871
Author(s):  
Shai Posner ◽  
Kurren Mehta ◽  
Alice Parish ◽  
Donna Niedzwiecki ◽  
Rajan T. Gupta ◽  
...  

1978 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 581-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark B. Orringer ◽  
Robert Lee ◽  
Herbert Sloan

1976 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Clark ◽  
A. Rahim Moossa ◽  
David B. Skinner

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Gao ◽  
Yan Gao ◽  
Xue Chen ◽  
Jie Qian ◽  
Jie Zhang

Objective. To investigate the differences in the results of esophageal function tests for functional heartburn (FH) and reflux hypersensitivity (RH). Methods. Patients with FH and RH and healthy volunteers (HVs) from the Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital and Beijing Chao-Yang hospital, who underwent high-resolution manometry and impedance (HRIM), and 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH recording (MII/pH) between 2014 and 2016, were enrolled in this study. Results. 36 HV, 147 FH patients, and 91 RH patients were enrolled. The postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index (PSPW index) and mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) values were significantly lower in RH than in FH and HV. The ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), fragmented peristalsis rates, total bolus exposure, proximal total reflux events, and distal total reflux events were significantly greater in RH than in FH and HV. Conclusions. Compared to HV and FH patients, RH patients exhibited greater IEM and fragmented peristalsis rates, a greater total bolus exposure, more proximal total and distal total reflux events, and reduced chemical clearance and mucosal integrity. By using the above described parameters, HRIM and MII/pH assays could be used to correctly classify RH and FH and hence allow physicians to provide adequate relief from associated symptoms.


Dysphagia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 864-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shai Posner ◽  
Kurren Mehta ◽  
Alice Parish ◽  
Donna Niedzwiecki ◽  
Rajan T. Gupta ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (09) ◽  
pp. 1061-1068 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Frieling ◽  
R. Kuhlbusch-Zicklam ◽  
C. Weingardt ◽  
J. Heise ◽  
C. Kreysel ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Feng Gao ◽  
Samantha Leach ◽  
Jian Yu Hao ◽  
Zhan Min Shang ◽  
Anthony Robert Hobson

Objective. To investigate the esophageal function tests in British and Chinese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).Methods. Patients with GERD were selected from the functional gut clinic, London, and digestive department, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, after taking the examinations of High-resolution Manometry and Impedance (HRiM) and 24-hour Multi-Channel Intraluminal Impedance and pH Recording (MII/pH) between 2013 and 2014. Chinese healthy volunteers who undertook HRiM were also selected as control group.Results. Fifty-nine British and 82 Chinese patients with GERD and 62 Chinese healthy volunteers were entered. Values for British patients, Chinese patients, and healthy volunteers were as follows: Lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP)16.0±8.6,16.5±10.0, and26.4±10.9 mmHg, peristalsis (normal/small break/large break) 24/12/23, 44/10/28, and 57/1/4, total bolus transit time (TBTT)7.3±1.3,7.6±1.2, and6.9±0.9 s, and complete bolus transit rate (CBTR)66.7±37.8,61.7±36.4, and90.3±14.0%, respectively. Stepwise linear regression analysis showed that age, gender, and ethnicity did not have significant effect on LESP, TBTT, esophageal peristalsis, and CBTR in patients with GERD.Conclusions. British and Chinese patients with GERD presented similar values of LESP, TBTT, and impaired esophageal peristalsis and CBTR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document