Routes to failure: Analysis of 41 civil aviation accidents from the Republic of China using the human factors analysis and classification system

2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 426-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Chin Li ◽  
Don Harris ◽  
Chung-San Yu
2017 ◽  
pp. 73-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Shappell ◽  
Cristy Detwiler ◽  
Kali Holcomb ◽  
Carla Hackworth ◽  
Albert Boquet ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Wen-Chin Li ◽  
Don Harris

The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS, Wiegmann & Shappell, 2003) was developed as an analytical framework for the investigation of the role of human factors in aviation accidents. HFACS is based upon Reason's model (1990) of human error in which active failures are associated with the performance of front -line operators in complex systems and latent failures are characterized as inadequacies which lie dormant within a system for a long time, and are only trigge red when combined with other factors to breach the system's defenses. In this research HFACS was used to analyze accidents occurring in civil aviation aircraft in the Republic of China (ROC). Forty-one accident reports from the Aviation Safety Council (A SC) were analyzed. Relationships in the HFACS framework were identified linking fallible decisions at higher (organizational) levels with supervisory practices, thereby creating the preconditions for unsafe acts and hence indirectly impairing the performance of pilots.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gui Ye ◽  
Qin Tan ◽  
Xiaoli Gong ◽  
Qingting Xiang ◽  
Yuhe Wang ◽  
...  

Human errors are one of the major contributors of accidents. In order to improve the safety performance, human errors have to be addressed. Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) has been developed as an analytical framework for the investigation of the role of human errors in aviation accidents. However, the HFACS framework did not reveal the relationships describing the effect among diverse factors at different levels. Similarly, its interior structure was not exposed. As a result, it is difficult to identify critical paths and key factors. Therefore, an improved Human Factors Analysis and Classification System in the construction industry (I-HFACS) was developed in this study. An analytical I-HFACS mechanism was designed to interpret how activities and decisions made by upper management lead to operator errors and subsequent accidents. Critical paths were highlighted. Similarly, key human factors were identified, that is, “regulatory factors,” “organizational process,” “supervisory violations,” “adverse spiritual state,” “skill underutilization,” “skill-based errors,” and “violations.” Findings provided useful references for the construction industry to improve the safety performance.


2015 ◽  
Vol 86 (8) ◽  
pp. 728-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara N. Cohen ◽  
Douglas A. Wiegmann ◽  
Scott A. Shappell

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (10) ◽  
pp. 1403-1411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Neuhaus ◽  
Matthias Huck ◽  
Götz Hofmann ◽  
Michael St. Pierre ◽  
Markus A. Weigand ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document